tigers
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Solve the Problem

To: "DrMayf" <drmayf@teknett.com>, "Larry Paulick" <larry.p@erols.com>,
Subject: Re: Solve the Problem
From: "DrMayf" <drmayf@teknett.com>
Date: Sun, 8 Sep 2002 10:07:52 -0700
Jeeze, left ou a word that changes meaning.  change the sentence "The
distributor is completely electrical..." to "The distributor is not
completely electrical and indeed the electrical component performed
flawlessly."

mayf, the red faced red necked really ignorant desert rat in pahrump
----- Original Message -----
From: "DrMayf" <drmayf@teknett.com>
To: "Larry Paulick" <larry.p@erols.com>; "Rich Atherton" <aka.gumby@gte.net>
Cc: "Tiger Maill List" <tigers@autox.team.net>
Sent: Sunday, September 08, 2002 9:55 AM
Subject: Re: Solve the Problem


> I also need to protest a tad. The distributor is completely electrical and
> indeed the electrical compnent performed flawlessly! The elctrical part
> simply provides a close encounter through which the spark can jump to each
> cylinder's leads. The coil contact is purely mechanical with a carbon tip
> touching the coil connection at the rotor. If you still have points, then
> they are mechanical simply interrupting the coil charging circuit to
provide
> dwell in charging the coil. This problem had absolutely nothing to do with
> the original premise of being asociated with the starter change out. Nor
of
> it being electrical. This was a simple (as stated) MECHANICAL problem. All
> parts performed exactly as they were designed to do. No fault in any
system.
> I want my money back!
>
> mayf, the red necked ignorant desert rat in Pahrump

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>