No, actually, the common sense part was that some people really need this
service, and others don't. People who have owned their cars since new (or
almost new) usually know exactly what their car is, and usually have a good
idea of what it is worth. They also usually have lots of stuff on hand,
after owning the car for so long, to prove it's history. If not, they or
the prospective owner can have the car TAC'd.
I fully respect your thoughts about not getting your car TAC'd and THAT was
my point -- you don't need to. If you feel the need, use it. If not,
don't. However, let's not pick on the program as it is very valuable to
some, and the effort of those involved should be appreciated by all in the
Tiger community.
Sorry if I cam across otherwise -- that's the trouble with email, sometimes.
Shaun
-----Original Message-----
From: DrMayf [mailto:drmayf@teknett.com]
Sent: November 23, 2002 11:41 AM
To: Shaun Laughy; Tiger List
Subject: Re: Common Sense vs ?
See, this is what I was chatting about...Look at the subject...it is "common
sense" to get it tac'd but you are a fool if you don't. Not using common
sense and that implies idiocy. We are now on the outside looking in...it has
started...
mayf
----- Original Message -----
From: "Shaun Laughy" <tigerv8@shaw.ca>
To: "Tiger List" <tigers@autox.team.net>
Sent: Saturday, November 23, 2002 9:44 AM
Subject: Common Sense vs ?
|