The reason it doesn't work for me is that my mailer (or maybe yours)
breaks the URL into two lines, and that breaks the hyperlink. I just cut
and paste the URL into my browser's menu bar in two steps, and then
everything is fine.
It looks like a fairly nice personalized Tiger, the descriptive
hyperbole notwithstanding. I'm not sure if I like the style of the
flares, but hey - to each their own.
And before the debate comes up again - anyone interested in this or any
other Ebay vehicle, do your own homework on its authenticity.
Theo
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-tigers@autox.team.net [mailto:owner-tigers@autox.team.net]On
Behalf Of Tom Witt
Sent: July 16, 2003 9:39 AM
To: tigers@autox.team.net; Tom Witt
Subject: Re: Mark I (a) to Mark II upgrade! (link correction)
A number of people have emailed me and said that the link didn't work.
For
whatever reason the cutting and pasting (I tried again) of the link
http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&category=6472&i
tem=
2423773987 ) does not work. Sorry, but I can't explain why??? If
interested
in this "astonishing" Tiger upgrade just search Ebay under "Sunbeam
Tiger."
It was there as of 8:35 am PDT 7-16-03.
Tom
----- Original Message -----
From: Tom Witt <wittsend@jps.net>
To: <tigers@autox.team.net>
Sent: Tuesday, July 15, 2003 9:55 PM
Subject: Mark I (a) to Mark II upgrade!
> From
>
:http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&category=6472&;
item
=
> 2423773987
>
> >>>1967 Other Makes : Sunbeam Tiger<<<
>
> >>>The original car was a mark 1A shipped with a Ford 260 c.i. engine.
The
> original owner updated it to the 289c.i. engine and added a larger
cam, 12
> volt electronics thus making it into the mark 2.<<<
>
> >>>The SUNBEAM TIGER was built from 1964 to 1967 in two series to
> differentiate as SUNBEAM Mk I and SUNBEAM Mk IITH outward only at the
vehicle
> identification plate has a SUNBEAM Mk II a larger engine.<<<
>
> WOW, my Mark I has a 289 and it doesn't have 6 volt electrics either!
All
> this time I had a Mark II and didn't know it. I'm sure some will want
to
put
> my testicles in a vise for bring this up AGAIN so please understand it
is
for
> "amusement purposes only."
>
> Tom Witt B9470101
|