>From everything I've read most people prefer the F4B over the current
Performer. Some claim the Performer is basically just an aluminum version
of the standard 4bbl. manifold. Being that there are a number of "factory"
manifolds I'm not sure how they make the comparison. They seem to state
that the F4B falls somewhere between the regular Performer and an "Air Gap."
Anyway, that is all, "I've heard" information. I'm sure there are others
with real experience.
I have a regular Performer waiting installment. I got it used for $45 and
figured even if there was no performance gain to the engine the lost weight
had to count for something in a front heavy car.
Tom
----- Original Message -----
From: <AAAGLASSS@aol.com>
To: <tigers@Autox.Team.Net>
Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2008 2:40 PM
Subject: [Tigers] F4B or Cast 4BL Man
> Is one better than the other in producing power? Other than light weight
> is
> the F4B better than cast? Thanks
>
>
> B382002560
>
>
>
> **************Looking for a car that's sporty, fun and fits in your
> budget?
> Read reviews on AOL Autos.
>
>(http://autos.aol.com/cars-BMW-128-2008/expert-review?ncid=aolaut00050000000017
>
> )
> _______________________________________________
> Support Team.Net http://www.team.net/donate.html
>
> You are subscribed as atwittsend@verizon.net
>
> Tigers@autox.team.net
> http://autox.team.net/mailman/listinfo/tigers
>
> http://www.team.net/archive
>
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG - http://www.avg.com
> Version: 8.0.138 / Virus Database: 270.5.12/1595 - Release Date: 8/6/2008
> 8:23 AM
>
>
>
Checked by AVG - http://www.avg.com
Version: 8.0.138 / Virus Database: 270.5.12/1595 - Release Date: 8/6/2008 8:23
AM
_______________________________________________
Support Team.Net http://www.team.net/donate.html
Tigers@autox.team.net
http://autox.team.net/mailman/listinfo/tigers
http://www.team.net/archive
|