tigers
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Tigers] 66 or 67?

To: tigers@autox.team.net, todbrown@roadrunner.com, AAAGLASSS@aol.com,
Subject: Re: [Tigers] 66 or 67?
From: <sralsten@ca.rr.com>
Date: Sun, 31 Jan 2010 11:41:26 -0500
Funny but I hae a 65 titled car built in Jul 65 according to BON.
but my chassis number is way off yours near the end of Mk1 at 9473720

---- jhef101@aol.com wrote: 
> This probably fits better under this threadline, so it is a dual post.
> 
> 
> I dunno, I have a '65 according to Norm and the Book but it says '64 on the
> title. What do I have? The title kinda defines the year doesn't it?
> 
> 
> Jeff Hefner
> B9470028
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Tod Brown <todbrown@roadrunner.com>
> To: tigers@autox.team.net; AAAGLASSS@aol.com
> Sent: Sat, Jan 30, 2010 2:21 pm
> Subject: [Tigers] 66 or 67?
> 
> 
> I am in the same category as a couple of others here who have reported Tigers
> that were manufactured in 1966 but titled as a 1967. In my case, I bought my
> Tiger new in October of 1966 (it came off the Jensen line in August) but the
> powers that be at the New York DMV decided it was to be titled as a 1967 and
> it has always said so on my registration. When I and my Tiger moved to Maine,
> I presented the NY registration at the Maine DMV and they registered it as a
> 1967. I guess I could have objected, but, then again, you probably have never
> waited in line at the Maine DMV. Net result, I have a 1967 MkIA Sunbeam Tiger
> which carries the license plate 67Tiger to tick the purists off even more. We
> could have the same argument about a couple of Tiger II's that I have seen or
> heard of over the years that were title as 1968's and everybody knows there
> were none built that year. To me, the year is not the important thing, it is
> whether it is a MkIA or a MkII. What you call things doesn't matter too much,
> it seems to me. It is the essence of the object that matters. Of course,
> having come by my surname by way of what genealogists call a "non-paternal
> event" some 200 years ago, I am probably prejudiced.
> 
> Cheers,
> 
> Tod Brown (conceived 1940, born in 1941)
> B382002384LRXFE
> You are subscribed as jhef101@aol.com
> 
> Tigers@autox.team.net
> http://autox.team.net/mailman/listinfo/tigers
> 
> http://www.team.net/archive
> _______________________________________________
> Support Team.Net  http://www.team.net/donate.html
> 
> You are subscribed as sralsten@ca.rr.com
> 
> Tigers@autox.team.net
> http://autox.team.net/mailman/listinfo/tigers
> 
> http://www.team.net/archive
_______________________________________________
Support Team.Net  http://www.team.net/donate.html


Tigers@autox.team.net
http://autox.team.net/mailman/listinfo/tigers

http://www.team.net/archive

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>