tigers
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Tigers] Clutch fork.... Still....

To: <CoolVT@aol.com>, <wwwdg@webtv.net>, <johnp@ciseast.com>
Subject: Re: [Tigers] Clutch fork.... Still....
From: " Ron Fraser" <rfraser@bluefrog.com>
Date: Sun, 17 Mar 2013 20:56:27 -0400
Cc: john.procida@gmail.com, tigers@autox.team.net
Delivered-to: mharc@autox.team.net
Delivered-to: tigers@autox.team.net
Thread-index: Ac4jbjYFsbPwMDdiRz6hpSqAr/NXZQAAJbGA engine=2.50.10432:5.10.8626,1.0.431,0.0.0000 definitions=2013-03-17_06:2013-03-15,2013-03-17,1970-01-01 signatures=0 spamscore=0 suspectscore=0 phishscore=0 adultscore=0 bulkscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=7.0.1-1211240000 definitions=main-1303170280
Mark
    Ford could change the a part number several ways.

The year code could change - C3 = 1963, C5 = 1965, C8 = 1968.
Generally a year code change means the part was updated somehow but I'm
can't say for sure.
Many Ford parts had the year code change for the 6 bolt engine change over.


The 3rd digit is the division where the part was first designed - A = full
size Ford, O = Fairlane, T = Truck, Z = Mustang
This digit can easily change.

The body of the number for any part will not change - 7515 = clutch fork all
across Ford.

The last letter in the number is the revision level - A,B,C to Z.

The correct Ford Parts Manual will show if an older part has been updated to
a newer part number.
This is similar to the Rootes Parts List that show superseded part numbers.

I believe David Franchi has that kind of Manual and it is not showing a
direct replacement part for the Tiger Clutch fork.

Ron Fraser

-----Original Message-----
From: CoolVT@aol.com [mailto:CoolVT@aol.com]
Sent: Sunday, March 17, 2013 8:19 PM
To: rfraser@bluefrog.com; wwwdg@webtv.net; johnp@ciseast.com
Cc: john.procida@gmail.com; tigers@autox.team.net
Subject: Re: [Tigers] Clutch fork.... Still....



Ron,
I don't have a manual handy, but maybe you can explain the reason behind a
single change in digits of a Ford part number.  I know, for example, that
one digit represents the application of the part.  As I understand it, if a
part is changed the number will change, but the new part might still work on
the old application.

In the list that Dave presented, one or two of the part #'s changed by one
digit. Could we have something similar with the Tiger clutch fork.  In other
words, is a there a number that is close that will work on the Tiger.
Mark L
_______________________________________________

tigers@autox.team.net

Archive: http://www.team.net/archive
Unsubscribe: http://autox.team.net/mailman/options/tigers/mharc@autox.team.net


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>