This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
--===============9210073184010322041==
boundary="------------000904000501040805010203"
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
--------------000904000501040805010203
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Hello All:
The other day, afriend who owns a Tiger II found that one of his pie
mags would not
fit on one of the front hubs. In trying tofigure out why, we took a hub
off a Series V
Alpine that we have been dismantling and found that the mag would fit on
that hub
very easily. I would have thought that the hubs used on the Tiger II's
and the Series V
Alpines were the same and, as far as I can find, there is only one part
number on the
Parts List, but they are slightly different. Can anyone offer any
insight into this situation?
We also noticed that the brake discs on the Tiger II and the Alpine V
were different, with
the Tiger disc being thicker but slightly smaller in diameterthan those
on the Alpine.
Are these just ordinary variations in manufactured parts of is there
some other
explanation?
Thanks,
Tod
B382002384LRXFE
TAC 864
--------------000904000501040805010203
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
<font face="Arial"><font face="Arial">Hello All:<br>
<br>
The other day, a<font face="Arial"> friend who owns a Tiger II
found that one of his pie mags would not <br>
<font face="Arial">fit on <font face="Arial">one of the front
hubs<font face="Arial">. In trying to<font face="Arial">
figure out why, we took a hub off a Series V<br>
<font face="Arial">Alpine that we have been
dismantling and found that the mag would fit on that
hub<br>
<font face="Arial">very eas<font face="Arial">ily. I
would have thought that the hubs used on the <font
face="Arial">Tiger II's and the Series V<br>
<font face="Arial">Alpines were the same and,
as far as I can find, there is only one part
number on the<br>
<font face="Arial">Parts List, but they are
slightly different. Can anyone offer any
insight into this situation?<br>
<br>
<font face="Arial">We also noticed that
the brake discs on the Tiger II and the
Alpine V were different, with<br>
<font face="Arial">the Tiger di<font
face="Arial">sc being thicker but
sligh<font face="Arial">tly smaller
in diameter<font face="Arial">
than those on the Alpine.<br>
<br>
<font face="Arial">Are the<font
face="Arial">se just
ordinary vari<font
face="Arial">ations in
manufactured parts of is
there some other<br>
<font
face="Arial">explanation?</font><br>
</font></font></font></font></font></font></font></font><br>
<font face="Arial">Thanks,<br>
<br>
<font face="Arial">Tod<br>
<font face="Arial">B382002384LRXFE<br>
<font face="Arial">TAC 864</font><br>
</font></font></font></font></font></font></font></font></font></font></font></font></font></font></font></font>
</body>
</html>
--------------000904000501040805010203--
--===============9210073184010322041==
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
_______________________________________________
tigers@autox.team.net
Archive: http://www.team.net/archive
Unsubscribe: http://autox.team.net/mailman/options/tigers/mharc@autox.team.net
--===============9210073184010322041==--
|