autox
[Top] [All Lists]

RE: Nitrous plumbing

To: "'Craig Blome'" <cblome@yahoo.com>,
Subject: RE: Nitrous plumbing
From: "Mohler, Jeff" <jeff.mohler@wilcom.com>
Date: Thu, 15 Apr 1999 07:42:01 -0500
Well, NOS just isnt a competative thing in Autox..its would be harder to
class this than turbos to be honest.

it's more of a philisophical stand as I see it.  If a manufacturer released
a production car with NOS, then things would change im sure.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Craig Blome [SMTP:cblome@yahoo.com]
> Sent: Thursday, April 15, 1999 7:38 AM
> To:   Mohler, Jeff; 'Talus9998@aol.com'; autox@autox.team.net
> Subject:      RE: Nitrous plumbing
> 
> --- "Mohler, Jeff" <jeff.mohler@wilcom.com> wrote:
> > 
> > Remove it before tech..in fact, dont bring it near
> > the course at all.
> > 
> 
> This is something I've never been especially clear on.
>  I know nitrous is anathema according to the rule
> book.  My question is, why is this?  I know it's easy
> to blow up a motor by just slapping a bottle on it. 
> But from a technical standpoint, as long as you get
> adequate fuel to the engine, supercharging is
> supercharging whether mechanical or chemical.
> 
> Craig Blome
> _________________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>