autox
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: SM2 at Topeka

To: marka@telerama.com
Subject: Re: SM2 at Topeka
From: "Jeff Winchell" <Jeff@winchell.com>
Date: Thu, 08 Aug 2002 10:47:11 -0700 (PDT)
"Mark J. Andy" wrote:

> 
> Howdy,
> 
> On Thu, 8 Aug 2002 dg50@daimlerchrysler.com wrote:
> &gt; CP is case in point. Somebody with a lot of money, access to the right
> &gt; people, and the will to do so could build a car that would likely
> &gt; _decimate_ CP (look very, very carefully at the rules. A 
>&quot;proper&quot; CP
> &gt; car is something very much like a modern Trans Am or GT1 car - how
> &gt; many cars in CP even *approach* that standard? - with construction
> &gt; costs much on par with what it would cost to build a modern Trans Am
> &gt; or GT1 car)
> 
> You know, I'm getting pretty sick of hearing comments like this, and
> especially my buddy's Jeff's.

I agree that it must be tough when the objective numbers shout down your hopes 
so loudly.

 
> How about you guys actually _build_ a car and come _decimate_ CP and
> _then_ talk about how easy it was?  At least one hotshoe driver last year
> tried to jump into the class.  As I recall, he didn't fare too well.

So using ONE DRIVER proves it can't be done? <ROFL>
 
> I think you'll find that the top 5 to 10 cars in CP are built pretty
> damned well right now.  Can they be better?  Sure.  Can that be said for
> _any_ class that allows modifications?

Well, I wouldn't want to cloud the issue with facts<s> ....

but looking at the PAX performances of this year's NT and Nationals entrants at 
NT's, Pros
and Divisionals and just taking the top 10 cars ...AS YOU SUGGEST....

        RANK CLASS              PAX      Total NT and Nationals Entrants
           1 SS              85.837          99
           2 GS              86.234          90
           3 ES              86.303          78
           4 FS              86.465          69
           5 CS              86.576          93
           6 ESP             86.626          53
           7 HS              86.671          59
           8 ASP             86.759          58
           9 DS              86.784          67
          10 BSP             86.843          38
          11 STS             86.914          90
          12 CSP             86.968          59
          13 BS              86.980          99
          14 AS              87.003          45
          15 SM              87.417         103
          16 FSP             87.495          47
          17 FM              87.505          33
          18 CP              87.546          66
          19 F125            87.553          23
          20 DP              87.857          24
          21 DSP             87.994          49
          22 FP              88.100          20
          23 CM              88.367          46
          24 BM              88.513          25
          25 AM              89.350          19
          26 EP              89.872          29
          27 STX             90.377          25
          28 EM              90.852          22
          29 BP              90.911          12
          30 SM2             91.681          31
          31 DM              91.792          18

I can excuse the classes with a couple dozen entries for not having on average 
a great Top
10 PAX #. That leaves DSP, CM, EP and SM2 as the only classes having worse top 
10 entrants
than CP.

Class entry average, class entry average for those that entered an NT, 
Divisional or Pro,
Top 10 drivers... every time I narrow the filter to make it more favorable for 
CP's cause,
the answers keeping coming out the same. 

CP is a soft class.

Deal with it.

///  unsubscribe/change address requests to majordomo@autox.team.net  or try
///  http://www.team.net/mailman/listinfo
///  Partial archives at http://www.team.net/archive


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>