autox
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Nature of autocross (was: Heartland Park Reply)

To: Craig Naylor <magazine@pacbell.net>
Subject: Re: Nature of autocross (was: Heartland Park Reply)
From: Scott Troyer - DDR TestEng <stroyer@micron.com>
Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2006 13:27:29 -0600
In 2004, the winner of SS at Nationals had the 2nd fastest run each day.
The fastest run was posted by a different person each day. There are other
examples, I'm sure.

thanks,

Scott
SS#71

Craig Naylor wrote:

> Grandma Sam..... how exactly does the "second place or lower win", by 
> definition second place is um... second place.  Now if your inferring 
> 1st was DSQ'ed or something than second place become first place... 
> hence 1st place is still the winner, not the new second place.  If 
> your saying that the second place person on the first day moves up to 
> first on the second day.... well then they are now the fastest.... so 
> fastest does win.
>
> Craig
>
> Charlie,
>
> NO, not necessarily!  The fastest car does NOT always win a solo nor a 
> race nor a time trial nor an etc.!  Over a two day event, I have seen 
> the second place or lower driver win the event!  Consistency pays off:-)
>
> Grandma Sam
> PS:  I'll be taping the race.
>
> And Lloyd I do agree with you:-)




<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>