ba-autox
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Back to 8 Run Groups, and what it means for SFR 2006

To: Katie Kelly <aceontour@yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: Back to 8 Run Groups, and what it means for SFR 2006
From: james creasy <jcreasy@perforce.com>
Date: Wed, 01 Mar 2006 13:29:37 -0800
its easier to combine 8 groups into 6 than to expand 6 into 8.

james
OSP - Operational Speedometers, Pah!

Katie Kelly wrote:

>--- "Runnion, Ed" <Ed_Runnion@regionofdoom.com> wrote:
>  
>
>>In the 6 rungroup format, you end up with folks
>>working for roughly 1/6 of the cars.
>>    
>>
>
>This is an ideal, just as an 8 run group situation is
>an ideal. It fails to take into account the number of
>people who choose to work and run earlier in the day.
>
>I think it would have been better to try the new
>format later in the season, myself. People get so hung
>up on their personal agendas that they lose common
>sense, on both sides. Six run groups isn't the worst
>thing in the world, but maybe it didn't need to be
>implemented quite so soon.
>
>-Katie Kelly




<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>