datsun-roadsters
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: pollution, was unknown controls

To: weisner@seidata.com
Subject: Re: pollution, was unknown controls
From: "Stephen McCartney" <sgam@hotmail.com>
Date: Thu, 26 Oct 2000 02:55:20 GMT
Stop the economy, I want to get off!!!!

Seriously, we can't expect everyone to just stop buying new cars.  And cars 
are getting safer, faster, and cleaner all the time.  Great!
Now I consider myself to be something of a greeny.  I was even an employee 
of Greenpeace, once (many years ago!).  I live strongly by the three R's:  
Reduce, Reuse, Recycle.

Not for one second did I ever consider buying a Datsun Roadster on 
environmental criteria!  It's a 30y.o. gas guzzling (twin Solex's do that, 
you know) lead-emitting SOB.  And I love it.  No excuses.  No problems.  You 
don't have to justify your passions, IMO.

I'll look after the environment in every OTHER way I can.  8^)

Just my 2 cents...(which is about 1c US!)


>From: weisner <weisner@seidata.com>
>Reply-To: weisner <weisner@seidata.com>
>To: datsun-roadsters@autox.team.net
>Subject: pollution, was unknown controls
>Date: Thu, 26 Oct 2000 02:19:29 -0700
>
>I was told once that when you figure in all of the materials
>and energy it takes to build a vehicle, From the strip mine to the
>dealers lights, that a new car does more damage to the environment
>before it reaches the showroom than in all of the miles driven after.
>       There is probably a conspiracy between the government and the
>auto makers to prevent this from being told to the general public or the
>whole world economy would suffer because we would all be driving 30 year
>old cars.
>       Kurt Weisner
>
>
>Alex Avery wrote:
> >
> > Actually, a new Excursion or any other large SUV, including my '97 GMC
> > Sierra 2500 pickup, puts out less pollutants than even 1/2 a
> > roadster--unless you count CO2 as a "pollutant" which is arguable 
>because
> > CO2 doesn't hurt anyone or anything in the short run (15% or crop yield
> > increases over the last 50 years can be attributable to CO2 increases--I
> > know, it's my job).  So let's not start throwing stones at larger
> > vehicles--they're pretty damn clean these days.
> >
> > Alex Avery
> > Hudson Institute
> >
> > At 08:02 PM 10/24/00 -0400, datsunmike wrote:
> > >Fred,
> > >
> > >You bet!!!!! None of those stinkin regulations!!!!!! The right to 
>grossly
> > >pollute is an inalienable right of every American. Whoops, we do that 
>now
> > >with Excursions!
> > >
> > >Mike (who never wears seatbelts in the Roadster)
> > >
> > >----- Original Message -----
> > >From: <Fred_Katz@ci.sf.ca.us>
> > >To: <svgkm@halley.ca.essd.northgrum.com>
> > >Cc: <datsun-roadsters@autox.team.net>
> > >Sent: Tuesday, October 24, 2000 2:40 PM
> > >Subject: Re[2]: Controls of unknown function ('70 1600)
> > >
> > >
> > >> I didn't know they're illegal here. In the old days all the teenagers 
>had
> > >> them.
> > >>
> > >> As long as we're reminiscing, one of my memories of being a kid is my 
>Dad
> > >> throwing his arm out in front of me every time he'd hit the brakes to 
>slow
> > >> down for an intersection. His '54 Chevy and '59 Rambler had no 
>seatbelts,
> > >> they weren't required back then. I was afraid he was going to get a 
>little
> > >> close and clobber me with his arm, but it never happened. No airbags, 
>no
> > >> seatbelts, no headrests, kids climbing all over the seats. My Dad 
>briefly
> > >> had a Ford convertible, and me and my sisters would sit up with our 
>rears
> > >> on the trunk and our feet over the seatbacks while he drove.
> > >>
> > >> I think our parents generation had way more fun with cars!
> > >>
> > >> Fred
> > >>
> > >> ____________________ Reply Separator _____________________
> > >> Subject: Re: Controls of unknown function ('70 1600)
> > >> Author:  svgkm@halley.ca.essd.northgrum.com
> > >> Date:    10/24/2000 10:54 AM
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> My Dad used to have one of those on the steering wheel of his big ol' 
>Ford
> > >> pickup back
> > >> when I was lad - "Okie power steering". They're illegal now, in 
>California
> > >at
> > >> least - why
> > >> I have no idea.
> > >>
> > >> Gary McCormick
> > >> San Jose, CA
> > >>
> > >> Fred_Katz@ci.sf.ca.us wrote:
> > >>
> > >> > [snip] Do you have one of those spinner
> > >> > thingees on the steering wheel? [snip]
> > >> >
> > >> > Fred - So.SF
> > >> >
> > >> > ________________________ Reply Separator 
>____________________________
> > >> > Subject: RE: Controls of unknown function ('70 1600)
> > >> > Author:  "Ben Zech" <motormite@hotmail.com>
> > >> > Date:    10/24/2000 12:52 PM
> > >> >
> > >> > You are just way too coooool.
> > >> > BZ
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >> > >From: "Hall, Phillip" <Phillip.Hall@msfc.nasa.gov>
> > >> > >Reply-To: "Hall, Phillip" <Phillip.Hall@msfc.nasa.gov>
> > >> > >To: "'CalSpeed@aol.com'" <CalSpeed@aol.com>, 
>Fred_Katz@ci.sf.ca.us,
> > >> > >robinkrause@hotmail.com, jason@xio.com
> > >> > >CC: mtyler@hctc.net, datsun-roadsters@autox.team.net
> > >> > >Subject: RE: Controls of unknown function ('70 1600)
> > >> > >Date: Tue, 24 Oct 2000 07:34:14 -0500
> > >> > >
> > >> > >It can be used as a cruise control - on my '68 I used to set it in 
>2 nd
> > >> > >gear
> > >> > >at 2500 RPM and cruise to the hot springs on a dirt road as I sat 
>on
> > >the
> > >> > >roll bar and drove with my feet.   Great way to enjoy the Idaho
> > >> > >mountains:-)
> > >> > >
> > >> > >Phil
> > >> > >SEROC
> > >> > >
> > >> > >    -----Original Message-----
> > >> > >    From:     CalSpeed@aol.com [SMTP:CalSpeed@aol.com]
> > >> > >    Sent:     Monday, October 23, 2000 7:08 PM
> > >> > >    To:  Fred_Katz@ci.sf.ca.us; robinkrause@hotmail.com;
> > >> > >jason@xio.com
> > >> > >    Cc:  mtyler@hctc.net; datsun-roadsters@autox.team.net
> > >> > >    Subject:  Re: Controls of unknown function ('70 1600)
> > >> > >
> > >> > >    << Well, if you haven't used them, you don't have to worry 
>about
> > >> > >them. Wha
_________________________________________________________________________



<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>