datsun-roadsters
[Top] [All Lists]

"Wiggle Test" - Conclusion...

To: John F Sandhoff <sandhoff@csus.edu>, datsunmike
Subject: "Wiggle Test" - Conclusion...
From: "David R. Conrad" <conrad1@gte.net>
Date: Wed, 03 Dec 2003 08:59:46 -1000
(Alternative Subj:  Countergear Shaft Wear, 4spd.)

John and Mike:

Thank you very much for your observations and recommendations,
although they were contrary to what I "wanted to hear".  You
caused me to finally arrive at the right decision.

I really didn't want to go to the effort and expense in order to
rebuild the countergear assembly again - it had only been some
50,000(+) miles since I had done it, and that original tranny had
gone more than 140,000 miles without "breaking teeth".

The "wiggle test" revealed only the slightest amount of motion,
and I was trying to rationalize that the tranny had "many more
miles in it" before any rebuild was required.  I already had
plenty to do, to get the Roadster back on the road.

I finally disassembled the transmission to the extent that I
could examine the countergear shaft.  It showed more wear than I
expected.  The attached photo shows it, together with two other
(slightly rusted) countergear shafts.  The shaft on the left is
from my present tranny, the middle shaft is from it, as a "new
tranny" after 140,000 miles.  The one on the right was from a
tranny with an unknown number of miles which started "breaking
teeth" in 3rd gear.  The amount of wear (roughly estimated by
feeler gage leaves) is .008, .012, and .070, respectively.

I concluded that "any motion" AT ALL, is reason for rebuilding
the assembly!

Thanks, again!!

Dave
'68 1600
Kailua-Kona

p.s.  Any of the "cc" recipients of the "List" from whom the
attachment was "stripped" are welcome to the picture, if they
request.

[demime 0.99d.1 removed an attachment of type image/jpeg which had a name of 
C'gear shafts 1]





<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
  • "Wiggle Test" - Conclusion..., David R. Conrad <=