healeys
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Healeys] Rocker Ratio Redux

To: Bob Spidell <bspidell@comcast.net>
Subject: Re: [Healeys] Rocker Ratio Redux
From: Walt Peterson <walt2727@yahoo.com>
Date: Wed, 6 Jan 2010 08:57:27 -0800 (PST)
Yep: Jim Hockert says 1:45. I'm looking at roller rockers 1:65 but am afraid
the set-up may need a tall valve cover even without a cam. Anyone?
 
Walt

--- On Tue, 1/5/10, Bob Spidell <bspidell@comcast.net> wrote:


From: Bob Spidell <bspidell@comcast.net>
Subject: Re: [Healeys] Rocker Ratio
To: "Walt Peterson" <walt2727@yahoo.com>
Cc: Healeys@autox.team.net
Date: Tuesday, January 5, 2010, 11:02 PM


Nominal 1:1.5, though in reality it's a bit less I've been told.

bs

Walt Peterson wrote:
> rocker arm ratio for valve train, 3000: anybody know?
>  Thanks,
>  Walt
> _______________________________________________
> Support Team.Net http://www.team.net/donate.html
>
> Healeys@autox.team.net
> http://autox.team.net/mailman/listinfo/healeys
>
> You are subscribed as bspidell@comcast.net
>
> http://www.team.net/archive
>
>   


-- *******************************************************************
Bob Spidell           San Jose, CA            bspidell@comcast.net

*******************************************************************
_______________________________________________
Support Team.Net http://www.team.net/donate.html

Healeys@autox.team.net
http://autox.team.net/mailman/listinfo/healeys


http://www.team.net/archive

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>