healeys
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Healeys] Rocker Ratio Redux

To: healeys@autox.team.net
Subject: Re: [Healeys] Rocker Ratio Redux
From: John Vrugtman <javrugtman@htcnet.org>
Date: Wed, 06 Jan 2010 13:24:02 -0500
On 1/6/2010 11:57 AM, Walt Peterson wrote:

I've a set from Rockerarm specialists and they fit under the stock valve 
cover.

John
> Yep: Jim Hockert says 1:45. I'm looking at roller rockers 1:65 but am afraid
> the set-up may need a tall valve cover even without a cam. Anyone?
>
> Walt
>
> --- On Tue, 1/5/10, Bob Spidell<bspidell@comcast.net>  wrote:
>
>
> From: Bob Spidell<bspidell@comcast.net>
> Subject: Re: [Healeys] Rocker Ratio
> To: "Walt Peterson"<walt2727@yahoo.com>
> Cc: Healeys@autox.team.net
> Date: Tuesday, January 5, 2010, 11:02 PM
>
>
> Nominal 1:1.5, though in reality it's a bit less I've been told.
>
> bs
>
> Walt Peterson wrote:
>    
>> rocker arm ratio for valve train, 3000: anybody know?
>>   Thanks,
>>   Walt
>> _______________________________________________
>> Support Team.Net http://www.team.net/donate.html
>>
>> Healeys@autox.team.net
>> http://autox.team.net/mailman/listinfo/healeys
>>
>> You are subscribed as bspidell@comcast.net
>>
>> http://www.team.net/archive
>>
>>
>>      
>
> -- *******************************************************************
> Bob Spidell           San Jose, CA            bspidell@comcast.net
>
> *******************************************************************
> _______________________________________________
> Support Team.Net http://www.team.net/donate.html
>
> Healeys@autox.team.net
> http://autox.team.net/mailman/listinfo/healeys
>
> You are subscribed as javrugtman@htcnet.org
>
> http://www.team.net/archive
_______________________________________________
Support Team.Net http://www.team.net/donate.html

Healeys@autox.team.net
http://autox.team.net/mailman/listinfo/healeys


http://www.team.net/archive

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>