[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Chrome vs. Rubber

To: "Frank R. Krajewski" <>
Subject: Re: Chrome vs. Rubber
From: Chris Delling <>
Date: Thu, 01 Jan 1998 14:09:50 -0500

Once we're done thrashing your 64 (hopefully the doors don't fly open ;-)
)then you can thrash my 77B, you might be a bit suprised.  9.0 to 1 CR,
Piper Cam, re-curved distributor, no smog gear, and a Weber mixing the
juice.  No it's not how it was shipped from the factory, but it is as God
(and Mowog) intended it!

No one will argue that a stock RBB will ever perform like a stock CBB, but
nobody said it had to be stock (at least in Michigan anyway!)


Chris Delling

At 12:53 PM 1/1/98 -0800, you wrote:
>I invite anyone who prefers the rubber bumper B to the chrome bumper to
>test drive my 1964 B with app. 95 stock HP and then my 1980 MGBLE with
>app. 60 HP(after a good tune up!). Then extol the virtues of that rubber
>bumpered B. I love them both but the 64 is a true sports car performance
>wise. The 1980 is a very nice leisurely touring automobile the the SO
>Frank Krajewski (RI "Swamp Yankee")

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>