mgs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: 5 speed question

To: barneymg@ntsource.com, mgs@Autox.Team.Net
Subject: Re: 5 speed question
From: REwald9535@aol.com
Date: Thu, 7 Jan 1999 01:31:27 EST
In a message dated 1/6/99 8:22:03 PM Pacific Standard Time,
barneymg@ntsource.com writes:

> Less friction loss in top gear.

Barney,
Come on the friction loss would be greater than the advantage of  a .71 to 1
ratio?
I would have to think that the friction loss in a Laycock overdrive would be
greater than the friction loss of a simple 5th gear.  So if what you say is
true, then the LBC owners with overdrives would get lower fuel mileage in OD
then either they or I would in 4th.
In the market today fuel mileage sells cars.  So if you were going to build a
new car, common sense dictates that you will make the car as fuel efficient as
possible.  (Vipers and Vettes excepted).  So if your new car was going to have
a five speed, it would be as fuel efficient as possible.  I cannot for the
life of me think of a production box that has a direct 5th gear.  There has to
be a reason for this, and I don't think extra friction is the answer. <G>
$.02
Rick Ewald

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>