spitfires
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Starter spacers vs. shims

To: "Nolan Penney" <npenney@mde.state.md.us>, <spitfires@autox.team.net>,
Subject: Re: Starter spacers vs. shims
From: "William Davies" <bill@rarebits4classics.co.uk>
Date: Thu, 7 Nov 2002 20:14:31 -0000
----- Original Message ----- 
From: Nolan Penney <npenney@mde.state.md.us>

> Some engines mount the starter with nuts and bolts, not studs or
> threaded holes.  These types of mounts are inherently sloppy.  With
> these, you do use shims to properly space the starter motor in
> relationship to the flywheel. 
> The Spitfire has its starter mounted in a much more precise manner,
> eliminating the need for shims.

All of my Spitfires (and Heralds, 2000s, Dolomites etc) have been fitted with 
nuts and bolts. I can't speak for the last 1500s, but the similarly engined 
Dolomites of that era also had starters fitted by nuts and bolts,
    Cheers,
        Bill.

--
Rarebits4classics
       .......just what you've been looking for

PO Box 1232
Calne
Wiltshire
SN11 8WA
United Kingdom
http://www.rarebits4classics.co.uk

///  spitfires@autox.team.net mailing list
///  or try  http://www.team.net/cgi-bin/majorcool
///  Archives at http://www.team.net/archive


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>