spridgets
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: WANTED--vented Bugeye wheel

To: "Daniel Thompson" <dthompson@gbc.ca>, <spridgets@autox.team.net>
Subject: Re: WANTED--vented Bugeye wheel
From: "Wm. Severin Thompson" <wsthompson@thicko.com>
Date: Wed, 25 Aug 1999 21:39:49 -0500
References: <DB033617FC53D31185A2009027A8FA8D1BEB@HUNTER>
Reply-to: "Wm. Severin Thompson" <wsthompson@thicko.com>
Sender: owner-spridgets@autox.team.net
To all,

I believe Daniel is right... and that the early welded wheels were a
competition Special Tuning option, that like most things, later became
production.

WST
----- Original Message -----
From: Daniel Thompson <dthompson@gbc.ca>
To: <spridgets@autox.team.net>
Sent: Wednesday, August 25, 1999 4:01 PM
Subject: RE: WANTED--vented Bugeye wheel


>
> Listers,
>
> I was under the impression that the very early bugeye wheel halves were
> riveted together, not welded. At least that's the way they are on my '58.
> Easy to identify.
>
> BTW, I have 17 wheels in my garage. Will "donate" one for free if you pay
> the postage. You can take off the old dunlop tire yourself.
>
> Also seriously considering sending 4 bugeye bonnets to the crusher. They
are
> not so good but no rust through. You pick up!
>
> I am in Montreal, Canada.
>
> Daniel58612
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Paul A. Dolloff, Ph.D. [SMTP:pauld@ekpc.com]
> > Sent: Wednesday, August 25, 1999 12:17 PM
> > To: harris@lightspeed.net
> > Cc: spridgets@autox.team.net
> > Subject: Re: WANTED--vented Bugeye wheel
> >
> > Harris,
> >
> > During a concourse judging at SpriteRush a discussion evolved
> > concerning vented bugeye wheels.  It seems that all vented wheels
> > are not alike.  The very early ones had the round holes located
> > symetrically about the welding points that hold the hub to the rim.
> > Apparently, it was determined that this weakened the wheel.  Later
> > vented wheels located the round vent holes off center from the
> > welding points.
> >
> > BTW, I have a wheel for you if you want but it has been painted
> > black and will need some cleaning up.  I think it is the later type.
> >
> > Paul
> >
> >
>


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>