spridgets
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Social Darwinisn (NO LBC): WAS Re[2]: Regarding Ed's proxy?

To: "Bill Gilroy" <w.gilroy@verizon.net>, "Leo Speichinger" <60bugeye@ev1.net>
Subject: Re: Social Darwinisn (NO LBC): WAS Re[2]: Regarding Ed's proxy?
Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2002 11:46:54 -0500
Cc: "Ron Soave" <soavero@yahoo.com>, <spridgets@autox.team.net>
References: <20011231164247.86271.qmail@web11701.mail.yahoo.com> <000d01c19221$2d706040$bb99fea9@computer> <179197741507.20020103011035@verizon.net>
Bill,

Does this explain why you get lost when rallying?  Enquiring mi-------
never mind!

Sorry couldn't let that one pass :>P

Biff Jones
Pasadena, MD
'59 Bugeye, 'Kermit'
'62 Sprite, 'Ole Gray'
'71 Midget, 'Freebie'
http://sprites2.homestead.com

----- Original Message -----
From "Bill Gilroy" <w.gilroy at verizon.net>
To: "Leo Speichinger" <60bugeye@ev1.net>
Cc: "Ron Soave" <soavero@yahoo.com>; <spridgets@autox.team.net>
Sent: Thursday, January 03, 2002 1:10 AM
Subject: Social Darwinisn (NO LBC): WAS Re[2]: Regarding Ed's proxy?


> Hello Leo,
>
> Monday, December 31, 2001, 12:32:52 PM, you wrote:
>
> LS> Out of lurking mode from my 20 page research paper due on Jan 14
> LS>  interesting subject, Social Darwinism and the Supreme Court).
>
> Leo,
>
> Social Darwinism and the Supreme court?  Sounds like it could be
> interesting.  Is that anything like my theory or "Reverse Darwinism"
> or "Reverse Evolution"?  My hypothesis is that the US population is
> getting stupider over time, not smarter.  It goes like this:
>
> 1.  100 years ago if you did something stupid you died out in the farm
> field or factory thereby removing yourself from the gene pool.
> 2.  Now if you do some stupid they rush/drive/fly you to a trauma center
> and work hard to save your life.
> 3.  If the save you in step 2 the very fact that you are still alive
> means that you are diluting the gene pool.
> 4.  Then some ambulance chaser (aka lawyer) takes your case and sues
> for millions of dollars.
> 5.  If the lawyer wins more than 250K, the stupid person now does not
> have to work and spends all day in his/her double wide.
> 6.  Since they don't have to work, they have sex often, and being
> sub-standard they don't use birth control.
> 7.  Each child that is born further dilutes the gene pool.  They should
> have been remove in step 1.
>
> Therefore hospitals by saving lives and lawyers who sue on behalf of
> morons are lowering the mean IQ of the US.  I belive that this affect
> (now known as "The Gilroy Observation") can be measured.
>
> Maybe you should included that in your paper, just don't forget the
> reference.
>
> --
> Best regards,
>  Bill                            mailto:w.gilroy@verizon.net
>
> PS.  Someday Malthus will be right.

///  unsubscribe/change address requests to majordomo@autox.team.net  or try
///  http://www.team.net/mailman/listinfo
///  Archives at http://www.team.net/cgi-bin/wilma/spridgets


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>