spridgets
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Spridgets] Spridget racing in the wet

To: <spridgets@autox.team.net>
Subject: Re: [Spridgets] Spridget racing in the wet
From: Robert Duquette <robertduquette@sympatico.ca>
Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2007 10:39:20 -0400
Sorry!  :)

Mailing Address: ( from the site )
Merriam-Webster, Inc.
47 Federal Street
P.O. Box 281
Springfield, MA 01102

You would think that coming from a place named 'Spring Field' that they would 
know suspensions?? :)

> From: Peter C <peter@nosimport.com>
> 
> Musta been the Canadian Webster, eh?
> 
> Cars don't sway, they roll...  though I did see a Buick the other day 
> that wallowed and wiggled.... and another crabbing.
> 
> I think Miatas have an anti-sashay bar.
> 
> PPP
> ==
> At 09:16 AM 6/22/2007, Larry Daniels wrote:
> 
> >There are a lot of entries that are of the common vernacular, but not,
> >technically, correct.
> >
> >As Peter pointed out, even "anti-sway" bar should be "anti-roll" bar.
> >
> >
> >
> >----- Original Message -----
> >From: "Robert Duquette" <robertduquette@sympatico.ca>
> >To: <spridgets@autox.team.net>
> >Sent: Friday, June 22, 2007 8:59 AM
> >Subject: Re: [Spridgets] Spridget racing in the wet
> >
> >
> > >From Mirriam Webster on the net:
> >
> >sway bar
> >Main Entry: sway bar
> >Function: noun
> >: a bar that torsionally couples the right and left front-wheel suspensions
> >of an automobile to reduce roll and sway
> >
> > > From: "Larry Daniels" <ladaniels@sbcglobal.net>
> > >
> > > Daniel, it's an "anti-sway" bar.  Of course, you can choose to call it a
> > > "sway" bar, but....
> > >
> > > Sorry, I couldn't resist that.
> > >
> > > LAD
> _______________________________________________
> robertduquette@sympatico.ca
> 
> Edit your replies
> 
> http://www.team.net/archive
> 
> http://autox.team.net/mailman/listinfo/spridgets
_______________________________________________

Edit your replies

http://www.team.net/archive

http://autox.team.net/mailman/listinfo/spridgets

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>