I brought in the politics. But Buster does have a valid point of
questioning the person who delivered that senate report. While you and
I might not agree with his final analysis there are still 2 questions on
the table:
1) (and most important) Even if the author of the report is suspect is
that much new money entering the futures market a good thing? When the
federal regulations changed it did not work with the Savings & Loans in
the 80's and mortgage back securities of the last few years. I am not
the person to answer this question I worry that these changes might not
be a good thing.
2) How did Buster connect the various dot and fill in the blanks about
the author of the report?
-g
B- Evans wrote:
> Larry Daniels wrote: "Buster, are we going to have to listen to your
> never-ending politics all the way until November?"
>
>
>
> Larry, need I remind you that I did not initiate the topic? Perhaps it
> might be better to take the issue up with those who did.
>
>
>
> Buster
> _______________________________________________
> Support Team.Net http://www.team.net/donate.html
>
> You are subscribed as wmgilroy@gmail.com
>
> http://www.team.net/archive
>
> http://autox.team.net/mailman/listinfo/spridgets
_______________________________________________
Support Team.Net http://www.team.net/donate.html
http://www.team.net/archive
http://autox.team.net/mailman/listinfo/spridgets
|