triumphs
[Top] [All Lists]

Vacuum?

To: Barry Schwartz <bschwartz@encad.com>
Subject: Vacuum?
From: "\"Mr. Mike\" Passaretti" <passaretti@sol.med.ge.com>
Date: Fri, 1 Aug 1997 10:06:55 -0500
Cc: triumphs@Autox.Team.Net
References: <3.0.1.32.19970801063444.008f97a0@100.105.1.7>
>>>>> "Barry" == Barry Schwartz <bschwartz@encad.com> writes:

    Barry> Sorry, with all the talk about vacuum and boosters
    Barry> I just have to clarify something.  Vacuum, in this
    Barry> case is the absence (or relative difference) = of
    Barry> atmospheric pressure or 'air'.  The air PRESSURE on
    Barry> the other side of the diaphragm, opposite of the
    Barry> lower pressure or 'vacuum' side is what actual= ly
    Barry> does any work, not the vacuum 'sucking'.

Sure, now you're going to tell me it's the holes that do the
work, not the electrons.
                                                -MM

(Who still believes that torch batterys run out because
 they've absorbed too much dark)


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>