| To: | James Charles Ruwaldt <jruwaldt@indiana.edu> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: AC/DC (was Pertronix perplexia) |
| From: | Joe Worsley <worsley@ebicom.net> |
| Date: | Thu, 30 Oct 1997 10:43:12 -0800 |
| Cc: | triumphs@Autox.Team.Net |
| Organization: | Unorganized |
| References: | <Pine.HPP.3.96.971030111901.19275B-100000@falstaff.ucs.indiana.edu> |
James Charles Ruwaldt wrote: > > I understand all that, but why do we call them "alternators", when they > produce direct current? > Jim Ruwaldt > '72 TR6 CC79338U > Bloomington, IN > > They are really 3 phase AC generators. The stator winding produces the AC when the rotor magnetic field cuts the stator windings. The output is fed to a 3 phase rectifier to produce the DC. The reason for the change from generators to alternators is efficiency and smaller size. Joe Worsley 80 TR8 72 TR6 Tupelo, MS |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: AC/DC (was Pertronix perplexia), Barry Schwartz |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: AC/DC (was Pertronix perplexia), Ken Streeter |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: AC/DC (was Pertronix perplexia), Barry Schwartz |
| Next by Thread: | Re: AC/DC (was Pertronix perplexia), Ken Streeter |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |