| To: | "triumphs@autox.team.net" <triumphs@autox.team.net> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | [TR] oil. To zddp or not to zddp, that is the question |
| From: | "Fisher, Ed" <edwd@ti.com> |
| Date: | Fri, 8 Mar 2013 12:30:43 +0000 |
| Accept-language: | en-US |
| Delivered-to: | mharc@autox.team.net |
| Delivered-to: | triumphs@autox.team.net |
| Thread-index: | Ac4b+MC+lhQ41cQoS9WRChrW4NTGjA== |
| Thread-topic: | oil. To zddp or not to zddp, that is the question |
Thanks to one and all for the replies to my question. I appreciate the time taken. The consensus seems to be that sticking with an oil that has, at least some ZDDP, even after the break-in period is a smart thing to do-and can't hurt. Ed Dallas, Tx ** triumphs@autox.team.net ** Archive: http://www.team.net/archive |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [TR] oil science and break-in question, Tony Drews |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [TR] When to rebuild, Jeremiah@curryclan.net |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [TR] Science of the "Oil Issue" Part 2, John Macartney |
| Next by Thread: | [TR] Morning commute, Pete Arakelian |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |