triumphs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TR] New Alternator - Stag

To: "triumphs@autox.team.net" <triumphs@autox.team.net> kGQcylA0Leh3fHosGLLXTBiLM5C4MwbteHacj84Pdk3T3dmHKcJF2PGshQh5hUlL1pEUna8U3PfP9XRpUvAETZguM/Rcpzxuo3o=
Subject: Re: [TR] New Alternator - Stag
From: Anthony Rhodes <spamiam@comcast.net>
Date: Thu, 8 Sep 2016 06:49:47 -0400
Cc: "leejohn7@gmail.com" <leejohn7@gmail.com>
Delivered-to: mharc@autox.team.net
Delivered-to: triumphs@autox.team.net
References: <mailman.9.1473271202.7951.triumphs@autox.team.net>
In the old days "M" DID stand for "000", but maybe in the very early 70's it 
got standardized to K for "kilo"

This is one of the changes that cause a break in the rules that the letter for 
the power of 10 is the same and the capitalization indicated the sign of the 
exponent, eg 10  to the third power would be a capital letter and 10 to the 
negative third power would the the same letter in lower case.  

Now the letters are determined by the Greek  ( or is it Latin?) designation: 
kilo,mega, giga, micro, nano, etc and sometimes to keep it clear, you also have 
to use the Greek letter, such as for "micro". 

-Tony

Sent from my 1837 Babbage Analytical Engine

> Message: 2
> Date: Tue, 6 Sep 2016 12:50:36 -0700
> From: "Lee&John Howard" <leejohn7@gmail.com>
> To: Brad Kahler <bkahler1@gmail.com>
> Cc: triumph list list <triumphs@autox.team.net>
> Subject: Re: [TR] New Alternator - Stag
> 
> 
> Doesn't M stand for 000?

** triumphs@autox.team.net **

Archive: http://www.team.net/archive

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>