- 1. More about the GUN$T (score: 1)
- Author: tr6taylor@webtv.net (Sally or Dick Taylor)
- Date: Fri, 20 Dec 2002 12:00:32 -0800 (PST)
- List--Bob Lang makes some valid comments about the reluctance of the suppliers to stock this bearing. .....I'm sorry to say - my opinion is that the "bad parts (whatever that means) will be in the ch
- /html/6pack/2002-12/msg00500.html (7,678 bytes)
- 2. RE: More about the GUN$T (score: 1)
- Author: Mark Hooper <mhooper@pixelsystems.com>
- Date: Fri, 20 Dec 2002 15:33:19 -0500
- I am still waiting for the notice about my Gunst kit. (Hellllloooo Nelson... However I re-iterate my belief that $100 extra in parts to avoid tearing the car to pieces is a good deal. That being said
- /html/6pack/2002-12/msg00501.html (8,361 bytes)
- 3. RE: More about the GUN$T (score: 1)
- Author: "Simms, Bruce CIC" <BSimms@cicorp.sk.ca>
- Date: Fri, 20 Dec 2002 16:19:38 -0600
- Although I would guess that RF finances are tight due to the frequency of stockouts and backorders, perhaps in time they'll come around on the Gunst, to quote Charles "there is always a market for th
- /html/6pack/2002-12/msg00506.html (8,407 bytes)
- 4. Re: More about the GUN$T (score: 1)
- Author: Shane Ingate <madmax_xx@hotmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 23 Dec 2002 10:52:07 -0500
- Dick, I would contend that logic would set in long before frustration. I would happily fork over an extra $100 to avoid having to pull the clutch again. Most Sunday drivers will also see this logic w
- /html/6pack/2002-12/msg00580.html (7,412 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu