Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Armstrong\s+Shocks\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Armstrong\s+Shocks\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. Armstrong Shocks (score: 1): Author: Christopher Ball <triumph@io.org>; Date: Tue, 23 Nov 1993 15:06:24 -0500; My Healey (64 3000 Mk.III. Phase 2) is riding very low. (Just imagine eh?) No, I mean very low, and it's the rear shocks I think. Are any of you vintage racing types using thicker fluid to firm the l; /html/british-cars/1993-11/msg00465.html (6,778 bytes)
2. Re: Armstrong Shocks (score: 1): Author: mjb@triumph (Mark J Bradakis); Date: Tue, 23 Nov 1993 13:15:44 -0700; The lever shocks should have *nothing* to do with the ride height. If you are talking about it bottoming out too frequently, then that might be the shocks, in part, but chances are the problem is the; /html/british-cars/1993-11/msg00466.html (6,571 bytes)
3. Re: Armstrong Shocks (score: 1): Author: lupienj@wal.hp.com (John Lupien); Date: Tue, 23 Nov 93 15:21:07 EST; I don't see how thicker fluid is going to raise the ride height any. Maybe it will take longer to settle, but it will settle to the same point. If you are riding too low, it is typically because of; /html/british-cars/1993-11/msg00467.html (7,400 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]