Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*New\s+MGB\s*$/: 26 ]

Total 26 documents matching your query.

1. New MGB (score: 1)
Author: MGBracer80@aol.com
Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2002 17:52:19 EDT
I don't understand, why is everyone is comparing the classic MG's with the new MG's? I would be proud to drive any car with an MG badge on it but that's just me. Troy H 1980 MGB LE It's not a hobby i
/html/mgs/2002-10/msg00688.html (7,228 bytes)

2. FW: New MGB (score: 1)
Author: "Dodd, Kelvin" <doddk@mossmotors.com>
Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2002 15:34:06 -0700
It's a disease that is passed on from one generation of owners to the next. Pre-war owners look down on post war cars T series owners look down on MGAs MGA owners look down on MGBs MGB owners look d
/html/mgs/2002-10/msg00689.html (8,235 bytes)

3. Re: New MGB (score: 1)
Author: Kevin Shertz <kshertz@bellatlantic.net>
Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2002 18:48:53 -0400
Argh! You beat me to it! ;) I think the debate probably rages in every "enthusiast" car circle around. Makes me wonder what vintage owners of Thunderbirds, Minis and Beetles think of the latest versi
/html/mgs/2002-10/msg00691.html (8,228 bytes)

4. RE: New MGB (score: 1)
Author: "Dodd, Kelvin" <doddk@mossmotors.com>
Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2002 15:50:06 -0700
Kevin & Troy. It's an interesting note that the two of you are enthusiastic about rubber bumper MGBs, which are looked down upon by owners of chrome bumper MGBs. It's all rather confusing really. Kel
/html/mgs/2002-10/msg00692.html (8,110 bytes)

5. RE: New MGB (score: 1)
Author: "Dodd, Kelvin" <doddk@mossmotors.com>
Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2002 16:00:37 -0700
I am suitably chastened. I'd hoped the obvious attack of MGFs by an alleged MGB owner would have been evidence of satire, but I guess I was too subtle for the electronic medium. Please attach suitab
/html/mgs/2002-10/msg00693.html (8,761 bytes)

6. Re: New MGB (score: 1)
Author: Kevin Shertz <kshertz@bellatlantic.net>
Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2002 19:12:24 -0400
Bah!! I loved my chrome-bumpered '74 Midget and I love my rubber-bumpered '80 MGB. Both make me smile, and both turn heads when I go down the road... isn't that the whole point of owning one? If not,
/html/mgs/2002-10/msg00694.html (8,262 bytes)

7. Re: New MGB (score: 1)
Author: "Paul T. Root" <proot@horton.iaces.com>
Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2002 18:16:45 -0500
We're all getting old aren't we? Would have thought that our biggest car dreams (ok, ones that have a chance of coming true, I'll never get a DB4) are about Station Wagons. That ZT-T in St. Paul (the
/html/mgs/2002-10/msg00695.html (10,082 bytes)

8. RE: New MGB (score: 1)
Author: "Dodd, Kelvin" <doddk@mossmotors.com>
Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2002 16:27:40 -0700
I note the comment about St.Paul. Thanks for setting me straight. I'm into weird wagons. After seeing the new Ford V8 powered MG sport sedan I was in lust, since there was talk of a wagon version. I
/html/mgs/2002-10/msg00697.html (9,473 bytes)

9. Re: New MGB (score: 1)
Author: MGBracer80@aol.com
Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2002 19:35:46 EDT
Well I love all MG's old or new. The only thing better is a cute girl that loves cars as much as I do Troy H 1980 MBG LE It's not a hobby its a passion /// or try http://www.team.net/cgi-bin/majorcoo
/html/mgs/2002-10/msg00698.html (8,029 bytes)

10. RE: New MGB (score: 1)
Author: "Dodd, Kelvin" <doddk@mossmotors.com>
Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2002 16:38:47 -0700
Kevin: Thank you for making me smile. Yes, the whole point of owning these cars is enjoyment. They are not the fastest, or the best handling etc. etc. But darn it, you can't get a better value in sm
/html/mgs/2002-10/msg00699.html (8,741 bytes)

11. RE: New MGB (score: 1)
Author: Dan DiBiase <d_dibiase@yahoo.com>
Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2002 17:11:26 -0700 (PDT)
Huh?? First Miatas, now Foci?! Guess I shouldn't panic until I see neon under-car lights and LED windshield washer jets in the catalog, eh, Kelvin?! ;-D == Dan The Garden State (What Exit?) '76 MGB T
/html/mgs/2002-10/msg00701.html (8,820 bytes)

12. RE: New MGB (score: 1)
Author: "Lew Palmer" <lpalmer@roundaboutmanor.com>
Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2002 20:56:47 -0500
excuses Careful, now. I own a J2, a PB Airline Coupe, a TD, an MGA, and two MGBs (73 and 80 LE). Does than mean I look down on myself? :-) ...and I'm one of the guys actively trying to bring the new
/html/mgs/2002-10/msg00703.html (8,880 bytes)

13. Re: New MGB (score: 1)
Author: Aaron Whiteman <aaronw@wsu.edu>
Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2002 19:35:40 -0700
Oh, that is really a bad spot. You see, Kelvin missed a couple... CBB owners look down on RBBs "Real MG's are roadsters." (ok, not so much on this one) I wonder if F/TF owners look down on the Z cars
/html/mgs/2002-10/msg00705.html (8,863 bytes)

14. Re: New MGB (score: 1)
Author: "MonteMorris" <mmorris@nemr.net>
Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2002 21:50:57 -0500
Since I have one of both, does this mean I'm self-depreciating:-) Monte 79B, Carmine 67B, BRG 74 1/2 Rust, parts car enthusiastic /// or try http://www.team.net/cgi-bin/majorcool /// Archives at http
/html/mgs/2002-10/msg00708.html (9,207 bytes)

15. Re: New MGB (score: 1)
Author: Bob Shaw <shaws@mlcltd.com>
Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2002 22:31:35 -0500
You know, I've never seen an MG that I did not like. I think it would be neat to have _ of the new MGs. We currently have a '57 A, a '71 Midget and a '74 BGT (chrome bumper). -- Bob Shaw Check out Sh
/html/mgs/2002-10/msg00715.html (8,680 bytes)

16. Re: New MGB (score: 1)
Author: Chris Thompson <chris-mg@cthompson.com>
Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2002 12:32:19 -0400
I've never seen a PRODUCTION MG I didn't like. One of the "History of MG" books, I seem to recall a concept car during the worst of BL upheaval that was to be the MGB's replacement that was wedge sha
/html/mgs/2002-10/msg00733.html (8,867 bytes)

17. Re: New MGB (score: 1)
Author: "David Breneman" <idcb@airborne.com>
Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2002 10:28:00 -0700 (PDT)
MGBracer80@aol.com SEZ - Be satisfied if you find one that *tolerates* your interest in MGs. Loving them as much as you do may be just too much to ask for. I'm still trying to convince my fiancee tha
/html/mgs/2002-10/msg00769.html (8,434 bytes)

18. Re: New MGB (score: 1)
Author: JAMES SCHULTE <schultejim@prodigy.net>
Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2002 15:50:54 -0700 (PDT)
My wife likes MG's so much I was forced to find, strip and rebuild one for her. Boy, I hated every minute of it...NOT (-: She's great, and encouraged me to get the C for my next project. What a wife
/html/mgs/2002-10/msg00784.html (8,601 bytes)

19. Re: New MGB (score: 1)
Author: "David Breneman" <idcb@airborne.com>
Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2002 15:57:25 -0700 (PDT)
JAMES SCHULTE SEZ - Did she watch you work on it, or did she just like the idea that you were doing it naked? -- David Breneman | "Before there were CDs there were Distributed Systems S/W Analyst | r
/html/mgs/2002-10/msg00787.html (7,809 bytes)

20. Re: New MGB (score: 1)
Author: Tim Holt <holtt@nacse.org>
Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2002 16:16:26 -0700
This is not unlike my wife catching me polishing my midget in the garage the other day ;^) /// or try http://www.team.net/cgi-bin/majorcool /// Archives at http://www.team.net/archive
/html/mgs/2002-10/msg00789.html (7,597 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu