Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Single\s+rail\s+vs\s+three\s+rail\s+\-\s+what\'s\s+the\s+diff\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Single\s+rail\s+vs\s+three\s+rail\s+\-\s+what\'s\s+the\s+diff\?\s*$/: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. Re: Single rail vs three rail - what's the diff? (score: 1): Author: "Nolan Penney" <npenney@mde.state.md.us>; Date: Thu, 01 Jun 2000 09:13:23 -0400; That reply of yours was a big help. I've wondered just how much better the single rail box was over the older three rail box. New and improved doesn't always mean better. My car has a single rail 4 s; /html/spitfires/2000-06/msg00004.html (8,255 bytes)
2. RE: Single rail vs three rail - what's the diff? (score: 1): Author: Chris De Wet <DeWetC1@sapo.co.za>; Date: Thu, 1 Jun 2000 15:31:23 +0200; You could always sell the overdrive unit to me ( cheap ) :-) Chris de Wet PO Box 472 , Ifafi , 0260 , South Africa . Fax 012 - 3398118 , Telephone office 012 - 3398042 , Telephone home 012 - 2591129; /html/spitfires/2000-06/msg00006.html (9,229 bytes)
3. Re: Single rail vs three rail - what's the diff? (score: 1): Author: "Graham Stretch" <technical@iwnet.screaming.net>; Date: Mon, 5 Jun 2000 00:12:37 +0100; Hi Jeff I have driven both boxes and the main differences are the throw of the stick the three rail box has a wide neutral line i.e. the cross bar of the H and a short throw on the legs of the H wher; /html/spitfires/2000-06/msg00053.html (9,778 bytes)
4. Re: Single rail vs three rail - what's the diff? (score: 1): Author: "Jeff McNeal" <jmcneal@ohms.com>; Date: Sun, 4 Jun 2000 20:25:12 -0700; Hi Graham, The responses to my original question have all been very interesting. Lots of differing opinions. While I obviously dig the potential that the single rail gearbox is perhaps more robust, w; /html/spitfires/2000-06/msg00063.html (11,968 bytes)
5. Re: Single rail vs three rail - what's the diff? (score: 1): Author: Dean.Dashwood@enron.com; Date: Tue, 6 Jun 2000 09:39:06 +0100; My gearstick comes pretty close to my radio, but doesn't actually touch it. But this is a modern radio without the huge buttons that your radio has. Earlier gearboxes had a "bent" gearstick, which w; /html/spitfires/2000-06/msg00105.html (10,008 bytes)
6. Single rail vs three rail - what's the diff? (score: 1): Author: "Jeff McNeal" <jmcneal@ohms.com>; Date: Wed, 31 May 2000 06:58:20 -0700; Hello all. To those who have driven both, I'm wondering... What are the primary differences between three rail and single rail Spitfire transmissions? Is one more reliable than the other? Do they *fe; /html/spitfires/2000-05/msg01226.html (7,725 bytes)
7. Re: Single rail vs three rail - what's the diff? (score: 1): Author: Barry Schwartz <bschwart@pacbell.net>; Date: Wed, 31 May 2000 07:47:17 -0700; Well for what it's worth, the single rail was introduced as a "commonization (is that a word??;-})" with some other models currently in production, also referred to as the Marina box, since it was in; /html/spitfires/2000-05/msg01229.html (8,440 bytes)
8. RE: Single rail vs three rail - what's the diff? (score: 1): Author: Davies William-qswi646 <William.M.Davies@motorola.com>; Date: Wed, 31 May 2000 15:20:04 +0100; A well maintained 3-rail has a nicer shift than the single rail (IMHO). The overdrive equipped single rail boxes are worse - I believe the geometry of the shift mechanism was changed to clear the ov; /html/spitfires/2000-05/msg01232.html (7,769 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 8
Page: [1]