Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TR\]\s+radiator\s+contamination\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TR\]\s+radiator\s+contamination\s*$/: 9 ]

Total 9 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [TR] radiator contamination (score: 1): Author: Carl TR <cfmtr3a@verizon.net>; Date: Mon, 18 Jul 2011 08:50:32 -0500 (CDT); If the tires are stock diameter, that should be overdrive engaged. At 55 with stock diameter tires, you should see around 2700-2800 in 4th direct. Irv Korey 74 TR6 CF22767U Highland Park, IL triumphs; /html/triumphs/2011-07/msg00210.html (6,195 bytes)
2. Re: [TR] radiator contamination (score: 1): Author: "Randall" <tr3driver@ca.rr.com>; Date: Mon, 18 Jul 2011 09:41:10 -0700; Not sure how relevant this is but that RPM on our TR6 with 5 speed conversion (ratios about the same) in 5th gear equals 65 mph ... so I am guess No OverDrive ... -- "Thinking is the hardest work the; /html/triumphs/2011-07/msg00212.html (7,694 bytes)
3. Re: [TR] radiator contamination (score: 1): Author: John Macartney <macartney.john@yahoo.co.uk>; Date: Mon, 18 Jul 2011 18:59:50 +0100 (BST); OD engaged. Not engaged would be 2700 or so (assuming you have a 3.70 differential). -- Randall triumphs@autox.team.net Donate: http://www.team.net/donate.html Archive: http://www.team.net/archive F; /html/triumphs/2011-07/msg00213.html (7,598 bytes)
4. Re: [TR] radiator contamination (score: 1): Author: terryrs@comcast.net; Date: Mon, 18 Jul 2011 21:57:01 +0000 (UTC); More likely rust, IMO. Conventional brake fluid is amazingly corrosive, especially when it gets old. If it's any consolation, both of the caliper bleed screws were stuck on TS13571L when it came to; /html/triumphs/2011-07/msg00214.html (6,966 bytes)
5. [TR] radiator contamination (score: 1): Author: davgil at aol.com (davgil at aol.com); Date: Mon, 18 Jul 2011 09:08:41 -0400; To the more well informed. Yesterday was a beautiful weekend in North Georgia and I had the opportunity for a nice drive with my 1976 TR6. Great day until I heard that unusual sound from up front and; /html/triumphs/2011-07/msg00580.html (8,628 bytes)
6. [TR] radiator contamination (score: 1): Author: cfmtr3a at verizon.net (Carl TR); Date: Mon, 18 Jul 2011 08:50:32 -0500 (CDT); /html/triumphs/2011-07/msg00581.html (7,349 bytes)
7. [TR] radiator contamination (score: 1): Author: tr3driver at ca.rr.com (Randall); Date: Mon, 18 Jul 2011 09:41:10 -0700; Most likely nothing to worry about, as long as it continues to run cool. But it wouldn't hurt to backflush the radiator, in case any pieces got caught in a tube. The problem is the blue form-a-gaske; /html/triumphs/2011-07/msg00583.html (8,591 bytes)
8. [TR] radiator contamination (score: 1): Author: macartney.john at yahoo.co.uk (John Macartney); Date: Mon, 18 Jul 2011 18:59:50 +0100 (BST); I agree with Randall about instant gasket gunge. Many years ago as a wet-behind-the-ears Apprentice at Jaguar, I used the same technique - and got caught by the Engine Assembly Foreman. The punishmen; /html/triumphs/2011-07/msg00584.html (8,829 bytes)
9. [TR] radiator contamination (score: 1): Author: terryrs at comcast.net (terryrs at comcast.net); Date: Mon, 18 Jul 2011 21:57:01 +0000 (UTC); My question is where the blue gunk was applied. Guy at work has a small MG. Told me he was planning to replace the head gasket using the silicon to seal. I advised against it, but he did it anyway. M; /html/triumphs/2011-07/msg00585.html (7,759 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 9
Page: [1]