Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Triumph\s+TR\s+engine\s+numbers\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Triumph\s+TR\s+engine\s+numbers\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. Triumph TR engine numbers (score: 1): Author: "Bob Nogueira" <nogera@worldnet.att.net>; Date: Fri, 28 Jan 2005 12:32:01 -0600; Anyone really familiar with TR engine numbers? A discussion came up in a Morgan group about how the engines supplied by Triumph to Morgan were numbered in sequence with the Triumph numbers but carrie; /html/triumphs/2005-01/msg00880.html (7,301 bytes)
2. Re: Triumph TR engine numbers (score: 1): Author: ZoboHerald@aol.com; Date: Fri, 28 Jan 2005 14:30:39 -0500; == That sounds plausible. == == Uh, no. Triumph did NOT use the engine number as the chassis number; they're two separate numbers, usually within a few hundred of each other but really not directly r; /html/triumphs/2005-01/msg00882.html (7,413 bytes)
3. RE: Triumph TR engine numbers (score: 1): Author: "Randall" <tr3driver@comcast.net>; Date: Fri, 28 Jan 2005 11:49:24 -0800; I believe that's incorrect, Bob. Triumph engine numbers did not match the chassis numbers, and engines sold to Morgan (and others) is why. Randall; /html/triumphs/2005-01/msg00883.html (6,832 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]