Mail Archive Search: <+from:Andrew_Bettencourt@kingston.com>

Results:

References: [ +from:Andrew_Bettencourt@kingston.com: 249 ]

Total 249 documents matching your query.

21. I'm sure everyone knows by now... (score: 1): Author: Andrew_Bettencourt@kingston.com; Date: Wed, 29 Nov 2000 13:19:34 -0800; I haven't seen this floating around... Sweet one-pager in Sport Compact Car on Kent Rafferty and his domination of Street Mod this year (page 74 of the January issue) by Danielle Engstrom. Good read; /html/autox/2000-11/msg00518.html (6,496 bytes)
22. Re: Illegal tire warming??? (score: 1): Author: Andrew_Bettencourt@kingston.com; Date: Sun, 1 Oct 2000 19:26:50 -0700; The only way I see this as illegal is if you exceeded the speed limit in the area you were in at the time. Look to your Regional Supps for this. Or, of course, if you did a burn-out of some sort - an; /html/autox/2000-10/msg00013.html (8,907 bytes)
23. ST as a National Class (was ?!?!?!) (score: 1): Author: Andrew_Bettencourt@kingston.com; Date: Tue, 24 Oct 2000 13:43:18 -0700; I couldn't find it in the rulebook but: If a class is undersubscribed for 3 consecutive years, then it gets eliminated from National Competition. Would it then make sense that a new class has to demo; /html/autox/2000-10/msg00884.html (8,810 bytes)
24. RE: ST as a National Class (was ?!?!?!) (score: 1): Author: Andrew_Bettencourt@kingston.com; Date: Tue, 24 Oct 2000 14:00:56 -0700; Well I will tell you what it takes: a firm set of rules! And if I'm not mistaken, ST does not have that! FP is not a new CATEGORY, just a new subset (or class) of an existing structure. Street Tourin; /html/autox/2000-10/msg00888.html (8,968 bytes)
25. Re: STS Tire Rules (score: 1): Author: Andrew_Bettencourt@kingston.com; Date: Thu, 26 Oct 2000 16:52:53 -0700; It doesn't work like it does in stock...there is no treadwear requirement! That is the whole problem. It seems pretty simple to me. A rule that is based around an unenforceable item like treadwear is; /html/autox/2000-10/msg01007.html (10,730 bytes)
26. STS Tires Rules - Can we get some thoughts on spec tires? (score: 1): Author: Andrew_Bettencourt@kingston.com; Date: Fri, 27 Oct 2000 08:02:49 -0700; Someone brought up the spec tire solution. Seems to me this would be a great idea. Bring the proposal to each of the tire makers and see what they come up with for a suggestion as well as discount fo; /html/autox/2000-10/msg01058.html (8,142 bytes)
27. Re: Stock car classing and tech changes (score: 1): Author: Andrew_Bettencourt@kingston.com; Date: Mon, 30 Oct 2000 18:37:12 -0800; I see the technology as *advancing*, not declining. I think the current gen Hoosier A tire and the Kumho as just as good or better than the R1's of the past. Besides, tires are available to everyone; /html/autox/2000-10/msg01220.html (8,216 bytes)
28. Re: Stock car classing and tech changes (score: 1): Author: Andrew_Bettencourt@kingston.com; Date: Mon, 30 Oct 2000 19:36:11 -0800; I guess I have to disagree with you that a change needs to take place. I understand that the shift in technology may effect a SMALL amount of cars, but for the most part I would say that we are on eq; /html/autox/2000-10/msg01226.html (9,387 bytes)
29. C5 weight (score: 1): Author: Andrew_Bettencourt@kingston.com; Date: Tue, 31 Oct 2000 05:29:43 -0800; The Z06 and the C5 hardtop (pre Z06) weigh between 3050 and 3100. Both weigh about the same due to the options that come manditory on the Z06. You could get a Hardtop 'stripper' that weighs around 30; /html/autox/2000-10/msg01247.html (7,779 bytes)
30. RE: Help needed in classing a Cobra Kit Car. (score: 1): Author: Andrew_Bettencourt@kingston.com; Date: Wed, 6 Sep 2000 05:46:19 -0700; While Greg is correct to the letter of the rules, one would seemingly have to have a copy of the rulebook and the GCR in front of them while building thier kit car. The very notion that it is a "kit"; /html/autox/2000-09/msg00155.html (10,297 bytes)
31. RE: Help needed in classing a Cobra Kit Car. (score: 1): Author: Andrew_Bettencourt@kingston.com; Date: Wed, 6 Sep 2000 08:54:14 -0700; I guess my point is that menutia like wheelbase and track are items that could bump you out of Prepared if they weren't spot on the original car. And I can tell you that not many kit manufacturers ar; /html/autox/2000-09/msg00165.html (9,374 bytes)
32. E46 M3 (score: 1): Author: Andrew_Bettencourt@kingston.com; Date: Tue, 12 Sep 2000 19:02:31 -0700; I would think SS or the new Stock 1 would be a no - brainer. AB Nicholas Horton <nhorton@reliacom.com> on 09/12/2000 05:50:40 PM Please respond to Nicholas Horton <nhorton@reliacom.com> To: "AutoX (E; /html/autox/2000-09/msg00318.html (8,689 bytes)
33. Re: M3 Out of ESP - No Longer a Controversy (score: 1): Author: Andrew_Bettencourt@kingston.com; Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2000 18:33:39 -0700; Oh ya, remember at the 1995 Nationals when Tunnel beat Daddio? Mark was in his DOHC Neon and Bob was in that 318is? Bob is a MONSTER driver. He was only winning by .4 on the North after day 1. He add; /html/autox/2000-09/msg00353.html (10,974 bytes)
34. Was M3 - now South "power course" (score: 1): Author: Andrew_Bettencourt@kingston.com; Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2000 18:43:45 -0700; I will dispute the South as a power course. Look to ES beating DS and within ES, the WAY underpowered CRX finishing second. AND the new 'super-Celica's' not even cracking the top 3 - it was the old H; /html/autox/2000-09/msg00355.html (8,143 bytes)
35. Was M3 - - now ESP participation (score: 1): Author: Andrew_Bettencourt@kingston.com; Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2000 18:59:37 -0700; How many ESP drivers are in SM this year? Looks like around 10 cars are old ESP cars. That would have brought your ESP total into the ballpark where it blows your 'numbers' away. AB Jeff Winchell <jw; /html/autox/2000-09/msg00356.html (8,998 bytes)
36. Re: Was M3 - - now ESP participation (score: 1): Author: Andrew_Bettencourt@kingston.com; Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2000 20:45:16 -0700; Don't forget the Supra's for a total of 10. There are only 37 in ESP this year. Add the 10 I speak of and you get 47 this year - WAY down from 50 last year - come on. Total numbers look pretty simila; /html/autox/2000-09/msg00364.html (9,230 bytes)
37. Was M3 - - now ESP participation (score: 1): Author: Andrew_Bettencourt@kingston.com; Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2000 18:59:37 -0700; How many ESP drivers are in SM this year? Looks like around 10 cars are old ESP cars. That would have brought your ESP total into the ballpark where it blows your 'numbers' away. AB Jeff Winchell <jw; /html/autox/2000-09/msg00374.html (9,095 bytes)
38. Was M3 - now South "power course" (score: 1): Author: Andrew_Bettencourt@kingston.com; Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2000 18:43:45 -0700; I will dispute the South as a power course. Look to ES beating DS and within ES, the WAY underpowered CRX finishing second. AND the new 'super-Celica's' not even cracking the top 3 - it was the old H; /html/autox/2000-09/msg00375.html (8,208 bytes)
39. Re: Was M3 - - now ESP participation (score: 1): Author: Andrew_Bettencourt@kingston.com; Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2000 03:49:42 -0700; Supras WERE in ESP last year...so you lose a couple of cars there. ST is a newish class and (Street Touring) those drivers attending in a new class skew your results...seems simple to me. AB "Jeff Wi; /html/autox/2000-09/msg00377.html (9,039 bytes)
40. Re: Street Mod (score: 1): Author: Andrew_Bettencourt@kingston.com; Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2000 16:29:04 -0700; Kent ended today first I believe. I think he had a 51.3. AB "Larry Steckel" <lorenzoscribe@hotmail.com> on 09/14/2000 04:31:27 PM Please respond to "Larry Steckel" <lorenzoscribe@hotmail.com> To: aut; /html/autox/2000-09/msg00409.html (6,820 bytes)

Current List: 21 - 40
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] [13]