Mail Archive Search: <+from:dkern@napanet.net>

Results:

References: [ +from:dkern@napanet.net: 150 ]

Total 150 documents matching your query.

1. Re: Carb to dizzy hook up (score: 1): Author: David Kernberger <dkern@napanet.net>; Date: Wed, 22 Mar 2006 15:04:25 -0800; Barrie et al, If there is a vacuum advance mechanism unit on the distributor and your driving is mostly normal on the road activity, then connecting it up is an advantage in my estimation. The idea i; /html/buick-rover-v8/2006-03/msg00000.html (7,539 bytes)
2. Re: Buick main bearings in a Rover? (score: 1): Author: David Kernberger <dkern@napanet.net>; Date: Sat, 4 Feb 2006 21:05:02 -0800; To all, What say you?? This is a very interesting question to me. What I do not understand is what Jon means in relation to the "full thrust flange." Do Buick Main bearings have a different thrust fl; /html/buick-rover-v8/2006-02/msg00003.html (7,123 bytes)
3. Re: 215 bellhousings (score: 1): Author: David Kernberger <dkern@napanet.net>; Date: Thu, 2 Sep 2004 17:54:09 -0700; Jim, This difference sounds strange to me also. Anybody know why this is?? The Saginaw Trans. should work with the factory housing I have always been told. At least, if it is used with a BOP block a; /html/buick-rover-v8/2004-09/msg00001.html (7,333 bytes)
4. Re: H2 Carb for 948 (score: 1): Author: David Kernberger <dkern@napanet.net>; Date: Wed, 7 Jul 2004 01:50:58 +0000 (GMT); Bill, If this gizmo is black, is attached to a black fibre spacer about 1/2" thick, mounts between carburetor and intake manifold, and has an electric wire attached to a binding post on the top end,; /html/buick-rover-v8/2004-07/msg00002.html (7,640 bytes)
5. Re: GM 4 bbl intakes (score: 1): Author: David Kernberger <dkern@napanet.net>; Date: Fri, 9 Jul 2004 18:28:22 +0000 (GMT); 7/9/04 OOps!! Forgot to delete the tailings, so here it comes again. Dave K. 7/8/04 Larry and the lists, I had always assumed that all BOP 4-barrel intake manifolds were the same--obviousoly not so!!; /html/buick-rover-v8/2004-07/msg00005.html (8,690 bytes)
6. Re: Bellhousing information (score: 1): Author: David Kernberger <dkern@napanet.net>; Date: Fri, 9 Jul 2004 18:30:00 +0000 (GMT); 6/17/04--Now 7/9/04--Better late than never--Maybe???? To Oliver, James J, and the group, To the best of my knowledge, this bellhousing info, is right on the money. I would only add the hole spacing; /html/buick-rover-v8/2004-07/msg00006.html (8,658 bytes)
7. Re: Help w/Rover 3.9 piston choices (score: 1): Author: David Kernberger <dkern@napanet.net>; Date: Sat, 8 May 2004 17:22:20 -0700; James, I have seen this build formula several times and in several places over the years. What I haven't seen is specific information on the need (or lack of need) for milling of piston head and/or; /html/buick-rover-v8/2004-05/msg00004.html (8,070 bytes)
8. Re: Help w/Rover 3.9 piston choices (score: 1): Author: David Kernberger <dkern@napanet.net>; Date: Tue, 11 May 2004 18:39:44 -0700; James et all, A 10.4 to 1 C R is all fine to talk about, but how does one stop the dieseling after shutoff when using carburetors???? I have several cast iron engines (Volvo & Morris) with CR of abo; /html/buick-rover-v8/2004-05/msg00006.html (9,833 bytes)
9. Re: detonation / preignaition (score: 1): Author: David Kernberger <dkern@napanet.net>; Date: Wed, 12 May 2004 18:17:25 -0700; To the group, Thanks very much for all the good input regarding dieseling, detonation, and preignition--all related conditions, but not equivalent. I picked up some good ideas about some things I ca; /html/buick-rover-v8/2004-05/msg00010.html (6,476 bytes)
10. Re: Manual choke conversion (score: 1): Author: David Kernberger <dkern@napanet.net>; Date: Sun, 7 Dec 2003 17:47:34 -0800; Jim et al, I do not remember any such kit ever being available. I might be wrong. Have you tried to find out if there is any electrical heating coil conversion which would work with the stock bi-met; /html/buick-rover-v8/2003-12/msg00004.html (9,125 bytes)
11. Re: F-85 jetfire article (score: 1): Author: David Kernberger <dkern@napanet.net>; Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2003 18:56:39 -0800; James, If this is the magazine I think it is, the title is "Collectible Automobile." I also saw the article and, for the most part, felt it was well done. One interesting item was the contention of; /html/buick-rover-v8/2003-03/msg00006.html (7,545 bytes)
12. Possible Helicoil use (score: 1): Author: David Kernberger <dkern@napanet.net>; Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2003 18:19:02 -0800; To all, I have often wondered if it would make any sense to routinely helicoil (during a rebuild) all the head bolt holes, intake manifold bolt holes, and spark plug holes in a Rover/BOP engine in o; /html/buick-rover-v8/2003-02/msg00008.html (7,031 bytes)
13. Re: Crankshaft question (score: 1): Author: David Kernberger <dkern@napanet.net>; Date: Wed, 4 Dec 2002 17:44:11 -0800; Kent, What have you found out about that crankshaft? I have certainly never heard anything about any such animal so am curious. Cheers, David Kernberger -- Kent /// /// buick-rover-v8@autox.team.net; /html/buick-rover-v8/2002-12/msg00007.html (6,895 bytes)
14. Transmissions (score: 1): Author: David Kernberger <dkern@napanet.net>; Date: Sun, 8 Dec 2002 19:03:24 -0800; Hello all, To clarify a perhaps minor point--All T-10 Warner transmissions I have ever seen or heard of have a splined output shaft for a slip joint connection to the driveshaft--except the 61-63 Bu; /html/buick-rover-v8/2002-12/msg00011.html (6,948 bytes)
15. Re: Transmissions (score: 1): Author: David Kernberger <dkern@napanet.net>; Date: Mon, 9 Dec 2002 17:25:45 -0800; Jim, I am reasonably certain that the only difference, if any, is the length of the front portion. The slip joint should be the same. There is a double constant-velocity u-joint in the center also--; /html/buick-rover-v8/2002-12/msg00015.html (8,454 bytes)
16. Re: piston question (score: 1): Author: David Kernberger <dkern@napanet.net>; Date: Tue, 7 May 2002 12:34:57 -0700; Jim B. Jim, It refers to the particular aluminum alloy of which the piston is made. An excess of silicon, the main alloying element, is used. The excess silicon "precipitates" out and adds very desi; /html/buick-rover-v8/2002-05/msg00011.html (6,985 bytes)
17. Bob Hyclack (score: 1): Author: David Kernberger <dkern@napanet.net>; Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2002 18:57:37 -0700; To Bob Hyclack if you are out there--please give me your email address so I can ask you a question or 2 about an engine build you were doing which was described in the V8 newsletter awhile back. Tha; /html/buick-rover-v8/2002-04/msg00007.html (6,466 bytes)
18. Re: 300 heads (score: 1): Author: David Kernberger <dkern@napanet.net>; Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2002 18:31:00 -0700; Curtis, Thanks for the response but it does not address the question that Jon and I have asked. That question is how to get the 215 valley cover/manifold gasket to match the intake ports on the 300; /html/buick-rover-v8/2002-04/msg00008.html (8,795 bytes)
19. Re: V8 Cam (score: 1): Author: David Kernberger <dkern@napanet.net>; Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2002 20:39:39 -0700; Larry, My catalog from XKs Unlimited in San Luis Obispo, California lists cam bearings as part number RVR-RTC5918. I do not have a price sheet. If by any chance Rover are the same as BOP 215, then D; /html/buick-rover-v8/2002-04/msg00011.html (7,315 bytes)
20. Re: Old lurker rejoins V8 list for info on 4.2 rebuild (score: 1): Author: David Kernberger <dkern@napanet.net>; Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2002 20:47:24 -0700; Tom, The consensus of this group seems to be that these engines should not be overbored more than +.010" or +.020"--if I am reading the signs correctly. The sleeves are apparently very thin. How abo; /html/buick-rover-v8/2002-04/msg00012.html (7,870 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8]