Mail Archive Search: <+from:mark@sccaprepared.com>

Results:

References: [ +from:mark@sccaprepared.com: 119 ]

Total 119 documents matching your query.

101. Robert Lewis in FL, Guy Ankeny is paging you (score: 1): Author: Mark Andy <mark@sccaprepared.com>; Date: Tue, 9 Mar 2004 11:50:41 -0500 (EST); Guy would like you to give him a call... 805-279-1338. Just passing on the message. Mark; /html/autox/2004-03/msg00118.html (6,449 bytes)
102. Re: Subject: Re: shop manuals (score: 1): Author: Mark Andy <mark@sccaprepared.com>; Date: Tue, 9 Mar 2004 16:46:50 -0500 (EST); Your starting assumption is flawed. You're assuming getting the book is a reasonable thing. It isn't in many cases. In those cases, yes your local protest committee should go to the closest dealer.; /html/autox/2004-03/msg00122.html (10,593 bytes)
103. Re: Subject: Re: shop manuals (score: 1): Author: Mark Andy <mark@sccaprepared.com>; Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2004 21:01:02 -0500 (EST); I think most people in this discussion actually do understand that. What we're discussing is what that minimum documentation standard (prior to an actual protest occurring) should be. Pretty much, p; /html/autox/2004-03/msg00147.html (14,326 bytes)
104. Re: Subject: Re: shop manuals (score: 1): Author: Mark Andy <mark@sccaprepared.com>; Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2004 23:00:23 -0500 (EST); Perhaps. The Protestee needs to be given reasonable time to get the documentation the PC asks for (up to the FSM), but other than that, that's certainly the primary point. The related point is that; /html/autox/2004-03/msg00150.html (10,034 bytes)
105. Re: Subject: Re: shop manuals (score: 1): Author: Mark Andy <mark@sccaprepared.com>; Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2004 23:17:09 -0500 (EST); Depends. :-) In the case where the protest bond covers the documentation costs... I'd say the question of who's got the "burden of proof" is moot. Either the protestor or the protestee is gonna pay; /html/autox/2004-03/msg00152.html (10,059 bytes)
106. Re: Subject: Re: shop manuals (score: 1): Author: Mark Andy <mark@sccaprepared.com>; Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2004 11:56:07 -0500 (EST); So we should eliminate protest bonds altogether? Or set a common "engine teardown" bond that ignores that shop rate on a Ferrarri is a bit higher than shop rate on a Celica? Bull. You wanna protest,; /html/autox/2004-03/msg00160.html (9,525 bytes)
107. Re: Subject: Re: shop manuals (score: 1): Author: Mark Andy <mark@sccaprepared.com>; Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2004 13:15:27 -0500 (EST); If it does, then its broken. (assuming you're checking it by looking at the gears...) Transaxles complicate the hell outta things, don't they? Sorry. It was a general "you" and was stated in a harsh; /html/autox/2004-03/msg00161.html (10,207 bytes)
108. Re: Subject: Re: shop manuals (score: 1): Author: Mark Andy <mark@sccaprepared.com>; Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2004 17:00:59 -0500 (EST); Sure. Though of the two options (1, being able to get the FSM or 2, convincing a dealer to help) I'll bet you'll have more luck with the dealer. And of course we have this very same issue for many o; /html/autox/2004-03/msg00165.html (12,631 bytes)
109. RE: Subject: Re: shop manuals (score: 1): Author: Mark Andy <mark@sccaprepared.com>; Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2004 19:33:13 -0500 (EST); So how do you propose to fix it? Require an out of print or unavailable shop manual? The PC has the ability to ask for other documentation as well. If the Dealer network doesn't have it, someone mus; /html/autox/2004-03/msg00168.html (9,762 bytes)
110. RE: Subject: Re: shop manuals (score: 1): Author: Mark Andy <mark@sccaprepared.com>; Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2004 22:17:04 -0500 (EST); You haven't been reading the thread for a while, have you? We were discussing documentation requirements for all cars. We were also discussing how a PC could request documentation appropriate for th; /html/autox/2004-03/msg00170.html (9,617 bytes)
111. Re: Subject: Re: shop manuals (score: 1): Author: Mark Andy <mark@sccaprepared.com>; Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2004 21:30:26 -0500 (EST); I'm not really sure that the data we use to decide if a competitor's car is legal should come from the competitor. Mark; /html/autox/2004-03/msg00191.html (8,592 bytes)
112. Re: Subject: Re: shop manuals (score: 1): Author: Mark Andy <mark@sccaprepared.com>; Date: Sun, 14 Mar 2004 21:00:32 -0500 (EST); This could potentially work (or at least help) in the Prepared classes, where many of the things we're interested in are standard specs (wheelbase, track, stroke measurements, etc.) I'm not so sure; /html/autox/2004-03/msg00211.html (10,042 bytes)
113. Re: Looking for a "Pit Scooter"? (score: 1): Author: Mark Andy <mark@sccaprepared.com>; Date: Mon, 15 Mar 2004 15:53:23 -0500 (EST); I assume someone here is verifying that the thing isn't stolen? I mention that not as an accusation, but just because I've seen too many times where a bike (I used to race motorcycles) was listed as; /html/autox/2004-03/msg00216.html (7,783 bytes)
114. Re: Looking for a "Pit Scooter"? (score: 1): Author: Mark Andy <mark@sccaprepared.com>; Date: Mon, 15 Mar 2004 22:50:57 -0500 (EST); to be a thief. I'm not saying that's the case here in any means. someone could relay that to the Flying Miata folks so that they could rectify it. All they'd need to do would be to post a VIN, or so; /html/autox/2004-03/msg00220.html (7,830 bytes)
115. threaded collars for struts (score: 1): Author: Mark Andy <mark@sccaprepared.com>; Date: Sat, 20 Mar 2004 20:26:33 -0500 (EST); Does anyone have a source for the standard threaded collars for struts? I've got some threaded collars I picked up as part of a coil over/strut package (for a BMW 325is... Sorry! :-) that are cracke; /html/autox/2004-03/msg00244.html (6,721 bytes)
116. Re: Used car spec. database (score: 1): Author: Mark Andy <mark@sccaprepared.com>; Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2004 10:53:05 -0500 (EST); carfolio.com has lots of specs on cars. Dunno if they'll have everything you're looking for, but I've found them useful. What're you getting? Mark; /html/autox/2004-03/msg00254.html (7,067 bytes)
117. Re: [evolution-disc.] Update Question (score: 1): Author: Mark Andy <mark@sccaprepared.com>; Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2004 18:59:40 -0500 (EST); If the car is updated to _be_ a 2004 model year car, I believe its legal. I don't believe that a VIN plate is required. The shock allowance would cover the different valving and I would think C&C wo; /html/autox/2004-03/msg00268.html (9,257 bytes)
118. Re: [evolution-disc.] Update Question (score: 1): Author: Mark Andy <mark@sccaprepared.com>; Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2004 21:16:38 -0500 (EST); Well, Update/Backdate is a pieces/parts thing, not exactly what I'm talking about above. I'm talking about taking the 2002 car and doing enough work that it is indistinuguishable from a 2004 car. I.; /html/autox/2004-03/msg00273.html (9,921 bytes)
119. Re: [evolution-disc.] Update Question (score: 1): Author: Mark Andy <mark@sccaprepared.com>; Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2004 23:18:52 -0500 (EST); So if some vandal breaks in and scratches off all the VIN numbers on your car (in stock), you can't run there any more? What's the difference between my "indistinguishable from '04" car and your '04; /html/autox/2004-03/msg00275.html (8,856 bytes)

Current List: 101 - 119
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6]