Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\*\s+Power\s+Survey\s+\*\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\*\s+Power\s+Survey\s+\*\s*$/: 24 ]

Total 24 documents matching your query.

1. * Power Survey * (score: 1): Author: Unknown; Date: Tue, 20 Jul 2004 21:05:28 -0500; Hi everyone! OK - the TR3 now rides like a Champ. Here are the Mods - 1) BAR Rack and Pinion 2) Panasport 15x5.5 Alloys 3) Bridgestone Potenza RE950, P195/65R15 Tires - (They fit great) 4) 3/4 inch F; /html/triumphs/2004-07/msg00448.html (8,118 bytes)
2. RE: * Power Survey * (score: 1): Author: Unknown; Date: Tue, 20 Jul 2004 19:20:45 -0700; Hi everyone! OK - the TR3 now rides like a Champ. Here are the Mods - 1) BAR Rack and Pinion 2) Panasport 15x5.5 Alloys 3) Bridgestone Potenza RE950, P195/65R15 Tires - (They fit great) 4) 3/4 inch F; /html/triumphs/2004-07/msg00449.html (8,387 bytes)
3. Re: * Power Survey * (score: 1): Author: Unknown; Date: Tue, 20 Jul 2004 21:43:59 -0500; You know what Joe - I saw your article in Grass Roots motor sports. We talked about that engine - I remember it now. Have you got it running without the smog stuff yet? Do you have any stats on it li; /html/triumphs/2004-07/msg00450.html (9,706 bytes)
4. RE: * Power Survey * (score: 1): Author: Unknown; Date: Tue, 20 Jul 2004 20:06:23 -0700 i6L38ot2008088; Others may disagree, but I do not think it's possible to get a reliable 200HP out of the TR 4-pot motor. Unless you mean reliable as in "I can rely on it to blow up". If I were you, I would do the T; /html/triumphs/2004-07/msg00451.html (7,550 bytes)
5. RE: * Power Survey * (score: 1): Author: Unknown; Date: Tue, 20 Jul 2004 20:14:19 -0700; You know what Joe - I saw your article in Grass Roots motor sports. We talked about that engine - I remember it now. Have you got it running without the smog stuff yet? Do you have any stats on it li; /html/triumphs/2004-07/msg00452.html (8,507 bytes)
6. Re: * Power Survey * (score: 1): Author: Unknown; Date: Tue, 20 Jul 2004 22:21:24 -0500; Thanks Hugh! You are correct about the charm - no doubt about it. It's a paradox the likes of Shelby could not resist - a tiny little car and a ridiculously large motor. I'm no Shelby for sure but it; /html/triumphs/2004-07/msg00453.html (8,254 bytes)
7. RE: * Power Survey * (score: 1): Author: Unknown; Date: Wed, 21 Jul 2004 03:28:23 +0000; -- Original message -- I agree with Hugh. My vintage race prepared TR4 did 129 hp at the rear wheels on the dyno (approximately 145 flywheel hp). This engine is very tractable, and could easily be dr; /html/triumphs/2004-07/msg00454.html (8,223 bytes)
8. Re: * Power Survey * (score: 1): Author: Unknown; Date: Tue, 20 Jul 2004 23:11:37 -0700; Hi Wayne, I agree with the general concensus that getting a "reliable" 200 hp from the TR motor is unrealistic. Every mod you do to the engine will increase it's likelyhood to fail. I have built many; /html/triumphs/2004-07/msg00456.html (8,021 bytes)
9. Re: * Power Survey * (score: 1): Author: Unknown; Date: Wed, 21 Jul 2004 01:31:01 -0600; Along with everything everyone else has said, there's are the issues of driveability and cost, with regard to building a heavy-horsepower TR engine. If you take a look at the Competition Guide, it sh; /html/triumphs/2004-07/msg00457.html (11,129 bytes)
10. Re: * Power Survey * (score: 1): Author: Unknown; Date: Wed, 21 Jul 2004 20:48:01 EDT; << So which engine : 1) Do nothing - stay stock 2) Hop up the TR engine with Weber's, ported head etc. 3) Hop up the TR engine with a Supercharger 4) Transplant a Buick/Olds/Pontiac Rover 3.5 litre 5; /html/triumphs/2004-07/msg00491.html (7,624 bytes)
11. Re: * Power Survey * (score: 1): Author: Unknown; Date: Thu, 22 Jul 2004 15:11:55 -0700 FILETIME=[E67281C0:01C47038]; Hi Wayne, I would opt for 1 or 2. The original engine provides a fairly powerful, fairly well balanced car. For the money it will cost to engineer and build a one-off super TR 3 you could buy a Cobr; /html/triumphs/2004-07/msg00513.html (8,144 bytes)
12. Re: * Power Survey * (score: 1): Author: Unknown; Date: Thu, 22 Jul 2004 15:34:13 -0700; I think we are missing a good bet by not considering the 2000cc Toyota Celica GTS engine, 4 cyl, dbl overhead cam, 16 valve and a RELIABLE 180 HP. Available at your local auto recycle yard (Junk Yard; /html/triumphs/2004-07/msg00516.html (7,768 bytes)
13. * Power Survey * (score: 1): Author: "Wayne Brazinski" <wayne@brazinski.com>; Date: Tue, 20 Jul 2004 21:05:28 -0500; Hi everyone! OK - the TR3 now rides like a Champ. Here are the Mods - 1) BAR Rack and Pinion 2) Panasport 15x5.5 Alloys 3) Bridgestone Potenza RE950, P195/65R15 Tires - (They fit great) 4) 3/4 inch F; /html/triumphs/2004-07/msg01278.html (8,498 bytes)
14. RE: * Power Survey * (score: 1): Author: "Joe Curry" <spitlist@cox.net>; Date: Tue, 20 Jul 2004 19:20:45 -0700; Hi everyone! OK - the TR3 now rides like a Champ. Here are the Mods - 1) BAR Rack and Pinion 2) Panasport 15x5.5 Alloys 3) Bridgestone Potenza RE950, P195/65R15 Tires - (They fit great) 4) 3/4 inch F; /html/triumphs/2004-07/msg01279.html (8,841 bytes)
15. Re: * Power Survey * (score: 1): Author: "Wayne Brazinski" <wayne@brazinski.com>; Date: Tue, 20 Jul 2004 21:43:59 -0500; You know what Joe - I saw your article in Grass Roots motor sports. We talked about that engine - I remember it now. Have you got it running without the smog stuff yet? Do you have any stats on it li; /html/triumphs/2004-07/msg01280.html (10,379 bytes)
16. RE: * Power Survey * (score: 1): Author: "Hugh Barber" <tr6nut@sbcglobal.net>; Date: Tue, 20 Jul 2004 20:06:23 -0700 i6L38ot2008088; Others may disagree, but I do not think it's possible to get a reliable 200HP out of the TR 4-pot motor. Unless you mean reliable as in "I can rely on it to blow up". If I were you, I would do the T; /html/triumphs/2004-07/msg01281.html (8,418 bytes)
17. RE: * Power Survey * (score: 1): Author: "Joe Curry" <spitlist@cox.net>; Date: Tue, 20 Jul 2004 20:14:19 -0700; You know what Joe - I saw your article in Grass Roots motor sports. We talked about that engine - I remember it now. Have you got it running without the smog stuff yet? Do you have any stats on it li; /html/triumphs/2004-07/msg01282.html (9,552 bytes)
18. Re: * Power Survey * (score: 1): Author: "Wayne Brazinski" <wayne@brazinski.com>; Date: Tue, 20 Jul 2004 22:21:24 -0500; Thanks Hugh! You are correct about the charm - no doubt about it. It's a paradox the likes of Shelby could not resist - a tiny little car and a ridiculously large motor. I'm no Shelby for sure but it; /html/triumphs/2004-07/msg01283.html (9,481 bytes)
19. RE: * Power Survey * (score: 1): Author: emanteno@comcast.net; Date: Wed, 21 Jul 2004 03:28:23 +0000; -- Original message -- I agree with Hugh. My vintage race prepared TR4 did 129 hp at the rear wheels on the dyno (approximately 145 flywheel hp). This engine is very tractable, and could easily be dr; /html/triumphs/2004-07/msg01284.html (9,407 bytes)
20. Re: * Power Survey * (score: 1): Author: "T. S. White" <tswrace@pacbell.net>; Date: Tue, 20 Jul 2004 23:11:37 -0700; Hi Wayne, I agree with the general concensus that getting a "reliable" 200 hp from the TR motor is unrealistic. Every mod you do to the engine will increase it's likelyhood to fail. I have built many; /html/triumphs/2004-07/msg01286.html (9,063 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2]