Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Autox\]\s+Towing\s+discussion\s+\-\s+another\s+view\s+point\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Autox\]\s+Towing\s+discussion\s+\-\s+another\s+view\s+point\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [Autox] Towing discussion - another view point (score: 1): Author: spitfirejoe@email.com; Date: Wed, 09 Dec 2009 01:35:26 -0500; A friend of mine just told me he talked a North East Iowa manufacturer into building a "Small Bore" trailer. It's a single axle design - built to be "HEAVY DUTY, LIGHT WEIGHT, LOW COST, EASY TO LOAD,; /html/autox/2009-12/msg00004.html (7,964 bytes)
2. Re: [Autox] Towing discussion - another view point (score: 1): Author: Paul and Meredith Brown <l8apexrs@q.com>; Date: Wed, 9 Dec 2009 21:43:28 -0700; Single-axle trailers scare me, though I do see quite a few of them around. They are going to be a LOT less forgiving of weight distribution issues than dual-axle trailers, and don't have the nice inh; /html/autox/2009-12/msg00005.html (10,159 bytes)
3. Re: [Autox] Towing discussion - another view point (score: 1): Author: George Ryan <george.ryan@sbcglobal.net>; Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2009 13:00:28 -0800 (PST); All excellent points, Paul But there is another point of view that i would like to address. When it comes to single axle trailers let's take a moment and talk about where the rubber meets the road -; /html/autox/2009-12/msg00007.html (10,124 bytes)
4. Re: [Autox] Towing discussion - another view point (score: 1): Author: John Innis <jdinnis@gmail.com>; Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2009 16:08:02 -0600; My problem with those is the price. I bought a nice middle of the road double axel flatbed with electric brakes (both axles) and slide-under ramps for $2100. It is more than I needed to haul the Spit; /html/autox/2009-12/msg00008.html (10,142 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]