Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[FOT\]\s+110\s+MIG\s+Welder\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[FOT\]\s+110\s+MIG\s+Welder\s*$/: 10 ]

Total 10 documents matching your query.

1. [FOT] 110 MIG Welder (score: 1): Author: N197TR4@cs.com; Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2006 20:22:07 EDT; help! I am going to go shopping for an inexpensive 110 volt MiG welder for use on square tubing and light sheet metal. I dont want the cheapest, but the best bang for the buck. Clarke? I see some in; /html/fot/2006-09/msg00261.html (7,350 bytes)
2. RE: [FOT] 110 MIG Welder (score: 1): Author: "Joe Curry" <spitlist@cox.net>; Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2006 17:51:14 -0700; A couple years ago, Lincoln had a special offer for SCCA members that I took advantage of. With the promotion I think it was about $400. The little unit is great for sheet metal and stuff up to about; /html/fot/2006-09/msg00262.html (8,023 bytes)
3. RE: [FOT] 110 MIG Welder (score: 1): Author: "Bill Babcock" <BillB@bnj.com>; Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2006 17:53:46 -0700; The bad news is of course that you get what you pay for. Once you start bumping into the limitations of a cheap machine you start looking at the good stuff, which means you buy it twice and have a pi; /html/fot/2006-09/msg00263.html (8,841 bytes)
4. Re: [FOT] 110 MIG Welder (score: 1): Author: "Joe Boruch" <jaboruch@netzero.net>; Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2006 01:06:44 GMT; I have been using my Lincoln 110V mig welder for about 18 years. Using it with welding mix, rather than coated wire. I think it is an SP120, but I know that there are later models now. Joe(B) I dont; /html/fot/2006-09/msg00264.html (7,880 bytes)
5. Re: [FOT] 110 MIG Welder (score: 1): Author: "R. John Lye" <rjl@gt-classics.com>; Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2006 21:19:26 -0400; As Bill B. says "you get what you pay for" - another thing to consider, if you ever need parts, you'll be able to get parts for a Hobart, Miller or Lincoln... R. John Lye rjl6n@cstone.net; /html/fot/2006-09/msg00265.html (7,461 bytes)
6. Re: [FOT] 110 MIG Welder (score: 1): Author: "Mark J. Bradakis" <mjb@autox.team.net>; Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2006 19:55:16 -0600; I've got some low end Sears Craftsman unit, it mostly works. My main gripe with it is that the heat control is 5 discreet steps, not continuously variable. Many times I wish I could use half a step l; /html/fot/2006-09/msg00267.html (7,563 bytes)
7. RE: [FOT] 110 MIG Welder (score: 1): Author: "Henry Frye" <henry@henryfrye.com>; Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2006 23:01:06 -0400; I use a Lincoln Weld-Pac 100 with the gas kit. It was the cheapest Lincoln available when I bought it, and it does a decent job on little stuff. If I was doing anything more than the occasional weld; /html/fot/2006-09/msg00268.html (8,242 bytes)
8. Re: [FOT] 110 MIG Welder (score: 1): Author: dick ross <niteseeker@aol.com>; Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2006 23:20:46 -0500; I have a Hobart 135 is pretty good for up to 1/8 have not tried it on Got mine for less than 400 it was a closeout or scratch dent, seems to be as good as the millers we have at work. Not sure but I; /html/fot/2006-09/msg00269.html (8,102 bytes)
9. Re: [FOT] 110 MIG Welder (score: 1): Author: RustyTR4@aol.com; Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2006 07:20:46 EDT; Joe , When I fist went into business I bought a hobart handler 120, (15 years)and I have been using it ever since.At this point I have different welders, but I keep using the hobart for small stuff a; /html/fot/2006-09/msg00270.html (7,250 bytes)
10. Re: [FOT] 110 MIG Welder (score: 1): Author: Craig Wensley <wensley@adelphia.net>; Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2006 07:38:45 -0400; Go to your local welding supply house 1 Tell them what your application is. 2 Add 25% to the thick of the metal . 3 Will you be doing aluminum and or steel 4 What is the voltage at your shop 5 Will; /html/fot/2006-09/msg00271.html (8,064 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 10
Page: [1]