Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Fot\]\s+Dual\-\s+row\s+timing\s+gear\s+for\s+small\-crank\s+Spitfire\?\s*$/: 9 ]

Total 9 documents matching your query.

1. [Fot] Dual- row timing gear for small-crank Spitfire? (score: 1)
Author: n197tr4@cs.com
Date: Sat, 28 Aug 2010 21:03:56 -0400
If it is a Moldex, you can send it back to Moldex for repair. I sent one to them some years ago. Just be prepared to wait for a while for them to fix it. They made a new one for me in shorter time th
/html/fot/2010-08/msg00376.html (9,593 bytes)

2. Re: [Fot] Dual- row timing gear for small-crank Spitfire? (score: 1)
Author: "Rocky Entriken" <rocky@spitfire4.com>
Date: Sun, 29 Aug 2010 02:15:48 -0500
Will you have the car ready to run at Blackhawk with MCSCC .... the September event? Hope so. Jason, Friendly Ghost Racing GT6 #27 _______________________________________________ fot@autox.team.net h
/html/fot/2010-08/msg00378.html (8,973 bytes)

3. Re: [Fot] Dual- row timing gear for small-crank Spitfire? (score: 1)
Author: "Barr, Scott" <sbarr@McCarty-Law.com>
Date: Sun, 29 Aug 2010 12:26:38 -0500
Scott, I use the Kent Cam setup in all my engines. It make dialing in the the cam easy. I have one in stock if you want one. Joe --Original Message-- Chequered Flag Racing .net Joseph P. Siam 9833 De
/html/fot/2010-08/msg00379.html (7,408 bytes)

4. Re: [Fot] Dual- row timing gear for small-crank Spitfire? (score: 1)
Author: "Joe Boruch" <jaboruch@netzero.net>
Date: Sun, 29 Aug 2010 18:05:30 GMT
I'm with Rick on this one.B I've never used or had a double row timing chain.B They are more than double the rotating mass.B why spend all that money to lighen the crank and rods only to bolt it bac
/html/fot/2010-08/msg00380.html (9,065 bytes)

5. Re: [Fot] Dual- row timing gear for small-crank Spitfire? (score: 1)
Author: REK46@aol.com
Date: Sun, 29 Aug 2010 14:26:26 -0400 (EDT)
Umm, technically, the only rotating mass added to the crank is the extra row of teeth on the crank chain drive, so the additional amount is actually rather small (taking an extra ounce or so off the
/html/fot/2010-08/msg00381.html (8,241 bytes)

6. Re: [Fot] Dual- row timing gear for small-crank Spitfire? (score: 1)
Author: Jason Ostrowski <jason@multivintage.com>
Date: Sun, 29 Aug 2010 15:42:03 -0400
I disagree. Because the crank gear is connected to the chain, it takes the same amount of energy to accelerate the chain as it would if the chain's entire mass were concentrated around the rim of th
/html/fot/2010-08/msg00382.html (8,398 bytes)

7. Re: [Fot] Dual- row timing gear for small-crank Spitfire? (score: 1)
Author: Joseph Siam <jsiam1@earthlink.net>
Date: Sun, 29 Aug 2010 13:38:14 -0700 (GMT-07:00)
While the chain is not directly connected to the chainwheel it's full weight has to be accelerated. Consider a chain on a sprocket that was the same circumference as the sprocket. You would certainly
/html/fot/2010-08/msg00383.html (8,289 bytes)

8. Re: [Fot] Dual- row timing gear for small-crank Spitfire? (score: 1)
Author: fpspitfire@comcast.net
Date: Sun, 29 Aug 2010 21:17:12 +0000 (UTC)
Scott: All the agreeing/disagreeing over the amount of mass added aside, if you want the double chain it requires more than just adding and double row crank sprocket, double row cam gear, and the wid
/html/fot/2010-08/msg00384.html (9,388 bytes)

9. Re: [Fot] Dual- row timing gear for small-crank Spitfire? (score: 1)
Author: Michael Porter <mdporter@dfn.com>
Date: Sun, 29 Aug 2010 15:49:54 -0600
Can you let me know what ENGINE components you have had good reliability results with? I am about to prepare a TR6 race engine with the collective wisdom of the group! No use re-inventing the wheel.
/html/fot/2010-08/msg00385.html (9,594 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu