- 1. [Fot] Subject: Re: gearbox legality (score: 1)
- Author: Catpusher@aol.com
- Date: Sat, 22 Sep 2007 02:42:44 EDT
- Hi FOT and Bill, I will have a real response later, as it is very late here; but just in case Continental drops an aircraft tomorrow: I had no distractions whilst working on BB's gearboxes, not even
- /html/fot/2007-09/msg00233.html (7,378 bytes)
- 2. Re: [Fot] Subject: Re: gearbox legality (score: 1)
- Author: Bill Babcock <BillB@bnj.com>
- Date: Sat, 22 Sep 2007 09:31:30 -0400
- I hope you didn't misunderstand, Hardy, I treasure the gearbox you built for me, I consider it cheap at the price, and I have nothing but respect for your experience, your skill and your knowledge. _
- /html/fot/2007-09/msg00236.html (7,957 bytes)
- 3. Re: [Fot] Subject: Re: gearbox legality (score: 1)
- Author: Bill Babcock <billbab@mac.com>
- Date: Sat, 22 Sep 2007 09:52:34 -0400
- A little more clarification. I'm a writer. Worse yet I'm a guy who learned to write by writing advertising--in other words I BS'd for a living. Even though I don't do it for money any more I automati
- /html/fot/2007-09/msg00255.html (9,147 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu