Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Fot\]\s+Valve\s+cover\s+breather\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Fot\]\s+Valve\s+cover\s+breather\s*$/: 37 ]

Total 37 documents matching your query.

21. Re: [Fot] Valve cover breather (score: 1): Author: "Peter Vucinic" <pvucinic@netspace.net.au>; Date: Mon, 31 Dec 2007 14:32:03 +1100; To avoid ANY back pressures you should fit a one way / check valve at the exhaust venture. These type of check valves are available on some emission vehicles. Problem solved. That what I have on my; /html/fot/2007-12/msg00313.html (9,932 bytes)
22. Re: [Fot] Valve cover breather (score: 1): Author: "Peter Vucinic" <pvucinic@netspace.net.au>; Date: Mon, 31 Dec 2007 14:35:58 +1100; The Venturi system I have generates about 1.5PSI of negative at best. If you are looking for more than this, you should consider using a smog pump or similar. The venture is a 'cost you nothing' in h; /html/fot/2007-12/msg00314.html (9,385 bytes)
23. Re: [Fot] Valve cover breather (score: 1): Author: "Mark J. Bradakis" <mark@bradakis.com>; Date: Sun, 30 Dec 2007 20:43:04 -0700; The vast majority of replies that bounce due to size limits are because people include a bunch of crap in their replies that just doesn't need to be there. And quite aware of the irony, here's a pre; /html/fot/2007-12/msg00316.html (13,228 bytes)
24. Re: [Fot] Valve cover breather (score: 1): Author: DSPGTi@aol.com; Date: Sun, 30 Dec 2007 23:20:09 EST; I'm very surprised any Vintage organization would allow any crank case venting connecting to the exhaust system. After all we are talking about oil being injected in the stream after combustion. It h; /html/fot/2007-12/msg00318.html (9,247 bytes)
25. Re: [Fot] Valve cover breather (score: 1): Author: "Bill Babcock" <BillB@bnj.com>; Date: Sun, 30 Dec 2007 20:58:07 -0800; Actually, I know this can be managed better, though what I know works best with a dry sump. It's pretty easy to build a swirl can that will return the oil to the crankcase. On my Radical I would put; /html/fot/2007-12/msg00322.html (9,979 bytes)
26. Re: [Fot] Valve cover breather (score: 1): Author: "Bill Babcock" <BillB@bnj.com>; Date: Sun, 30 Dec 2007 21:01:36 -0800; too funny--my "mea culpa" bounce email got bounced. Oh yeah, now I remember. You'll just have to remind me every now and then that it's a good idea. I think I have a complete turnover of my entire in; /html/fot/2007-12/msg00324.html (8,777 bytes)
27. Re: [Fot] Valve cover breather (score: 1): Author: N197TR4@cs.com; Date: Mon, 31 Dec 2007 00:11:55 EST; For a TR4, it might be the lesser of two evils.... I really see no evidence of oil in my exhaust pipe, believing it likely burns off before getting to the end of the pipe. I have no scientific or emp; /html/fot/2007-12/msg00325.html (9,004 bytes)
28. Re: [Fot] Valve cover breather (score: 1): Author: JWoesvra@aol.com; Date: Mon, 31 Dec 2007 08:49:10 EST; I'm very surprised any Vintage organization would allow any crank case venting connecting to the exhaust system. After all we are talking about oil being injected in the stream after combustion. It h; /html/fot/2007-12/msg00326.html (10,184 bytes)
29. Re: [Fot] Valve cover breather (score: 1): Author: "Richard Taylor" <tarch@bellsouth.net>; Date: Mon, 31 Dec 2007 10:48:07 -0500; Joe A wrote about his personal opinion: ".......I have no scientific or empirical proof of anything..........." And now we have Iowa with the destiny of the entire United States and probably the whol; /html/fot/2007-12/msg00329.html (8,200 bytes)
30. Re: [Fot] Valve cover breather (score: 1): Author: BillDentin@aol.com; Date: Mon, 31 Dec 2007 11:10:55 EST; Actually Jack and Tony are both across the boarder in IlliNOISE. But ah yes,...for sure Bill Bryson would call Joe Alexander a "THUNDERBOLT KID" through and through. First thing every morning, he che; /html/fot/2007-12/msg00330.html (9,504 bytes)
31. Re: [Fot] Valve cover breather (score: 1): Author: "Scott Janzen" <S.Janzen@comcast.net>; Date: Mon, 31 Dec 2007 11:42:48 -0500; wait a minute. We have unified political thinking? I bet we shouldn't even go there. -- Original Message -- From: "Richard Taylor" <tarch@bellsouth.net> To: <N197TR4@cs.com>; <DSPGTi@aol.com>; <jwags; /html/fot/2007-12/msg00331.html (9,759 bytes)
32. Re: [Fot] Valve cover breather (score: 1): Author: N197TR4@cs.com; Date: Mon, 31 Dec 2007 12:15:16 EST; That's correct....we are a list of FREE SPIRITS. Or perhaps a list of Free Flowing Spirits. "TIME GOES BY QUICKLY WHEN YOU ARE ALIVE......" An Alexanderism </HTML> ___________________________________; /html/fot/2007-12/msg00332.html (8,273 bytes)
33. Re: [Fot] Valve cover breather (score: 1): Author: Herald948@aol.com; Date: Mon, 31 Dec 2007 13:30:31 EST; That's correct....we are a list of FREE SPIRITS. Or perhaps a list of Free Flowing Spirits. ==AM== And personally I think that Free Flowing Spirits are probably the best (if not only) way to deal wit; /html/fot/2007-12/msg00334.html (8,755 bytes)
34. Re: [Fot] Valve cover breather (score: 1): Author: "Bill Babcock" <BillB@bnj.com>; Date: Mon, 31 Dec 2007 11:26:49 -0800; Amen to all of that. I hate spinning in oil. In fact my big concern listening to how some of the guys are thinking about doing this is that it would turn their cars into oiling machines, doing a fine; /html/fot/2007-12/msg00335.html (11,050 bytes)
35. Re: [Fot] Valve cover breather (score: 1): Author: "Bill Babcock" <BillB@bnj.com>; Date: Mon, 31 Dec 2007 11:29:20 -0800; Unified in the same sense there there might be a unified field theory, but it probably would be so complex that no one would understand it. --Original Message-- From: fot-bounces+billb=bnj.com@autox.; /html/fot/2007-12/msg00336.html (9,850 bytes)
36. Re: [Fot] Valve cover breather (score: 1): Author: JWoesvra@aol.com; Date: Mon, 31 Dec 2007 17:09:56 EST; I'm very surprised any Vintage organization would allow any crank case venting connecting to the exhaust system. Once again, we will allow anything that works to help alleviate oiling the track. The; /html/fot/2007-12/msg00339.html (8,599 bytes)
37. Re: [Fot] Valve cover breather (score: 1): Author: Susan Kahler <spitfiresuz@141.com>; Date: Mon, 31 Dec 2007 16:33:46 -0600; I believe they are allowed as long as you don't utilize the downdraft for brake cooling... ;) Susan :) -- ** Never argue with idiots. They will drag you down to their level then beat you with experie; /html/fot/2007-12/msg00340.html (8,627 bytes)

Current List: 21 - 37
Page: [1] [2]