Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Fot\]\s+mileage\s+plus\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Fot\]\s+mileage\s+plus\s*$/: 29 ]

Total 29 documents matching your query.

1. [Fot] mileage plus (score: 1): Author: "Jack Brooks" <JackBrooks@alumni.duke.edu>; Date: Thu, 5 Jun 2008 21:53:57 -0700; Group I really wish that the racing community would embrace and develop the concept of performance as a factor of speed and efficiency. Obviously it is a major factor in the distance racing of NASCAR; /html/fot/2008-06/msg00130.html (10,744 bytes)
2. Re: [Fot] mileage plus (score: 1): Author: fubog1@aol.com; Date: Fri, 06 Jun 2008 07:17:15 -0400; I'm not an expert in the area, but "index of performance" was a factor in days of yore. Not to be a wise-guy, but it seems that the French used index of performance to make sure that a french team g; /html/fot/2008-06/msg00131.html (7,205 bytes)
3. Re: [Fot] mileage plus (score: 1): Author: Glenn Franco <gaf3@charter.net>; Date: Fri, 06 Jun 2008 08:31:14 -0400; With the current state of oil production and global politics, the can has pretty much been opened for us. The question remains, whether we as vintage enthusiasts are willing (able?) to broaden our pe; /html/fot/2008-06/msg00132.html (8,856 bytes)
4. Re: [Fot] mileage plus (score: 1): Author: "Steven Preiss" <spreiss@verizon.net>; Date: Fri, 06 Jun 2008 08:39:03 +1100; <<<<In my mind there no need to sacrifice these goals/ideals by introducing an aspect that is of growing concern to all who live on the planet.>>>> Certainly a worthy subject. Just not something we (; /html/fot/2008-06/msg00133.html (7,716 bytes)
5. Re: [Fot] mileage plus (score: 1): Author: JWoesvra@aol.com; Date: Fri, 6 Jun 2008 08:52:29 EDT; Absolutely correct. I'm interested in fuel performance but only in a market sense. What we're watching is largely manipulated fuel cost (not just our friends in the gulf, but lots of speculators ever; /html/fot/2008-06/msg00134.html (8,548 bytes)
6. Re: [Fot] mileage plus (score: 1): Author: Robert Lang <lang@isis.mit.edu>; Date: Fri, 6 Jun 2008 09:00:15 -0400 (EDT); Actually I'd characterize that among the "running off in the wrong direction" ideas. The cost--even just in resources consumed--would infinitely overwhelm the value. I know, I know, we'd be setting a; /html/fot/2008-06/msg00135.html (7,499 bytes)
7. Re: [Fot] mileage plus (score: 1): Author: "Steven Preiss" <spreiss@verizon.net>; Date: Fri, 06 Jun 2008 09:21:55 +1100; My old 66 Mini 850 got 40-50 mpg back in 1972...drove it to work every day....you could still blow off any chevy for a 100 feet....wish I still had it ** Get trade secrets for amazing burgers. Watch; /html/fot/2008-06/msg00136.html (11,251 bytes)
8. Re: [Fot] mileage plus (score: 1): Author: jwoesvra@aol.com; Date: Fri, 06 Jun 2008 09:40:49 -0400; Yeah, Me Too! Not because I think their intensions are not good but because if they really were interested in "saving the planet" They would scrap that old car instead of selling it. By selling it, t; /html/fot/2008-06/msg00137.html (7,593 bytes)
9. Re: [Fot] mileage plus (score: 1): Author: Bill Babcock <Billb@bnj.com>; Date: Fri, 6 Jun 2008 08:08:15 -0700; When we moved to Maryland from California in 2000, we rented a Crown Vic (the TR6 and our '91 Civic SI was a bit small for the trip that included 2 Rotties). I specifically ordered a white CV, and I; /html/fot/2008-06/msg00138.html (8,854 bytes)
10. Re: [Fot] mileage plus (score: 1): Author: REK46@aol.com; Date: Fri, 6 Jun 2008 11:35:11 EDT; followed bty a flock of NSU-TTS....and other D sedans ** Get trade secrets for amazing burgers. Watch "Cooking with Tyler Florence" on AOL Food. (http://food.aol.com/tyler-florence?video=4?&NCID=; /html/fot/2008-06/msg00140.html (8,445 bytes)
11. Re: [Fot] mileage plus (score: 1): Author: "Joe Curry" <spitlist@cox.net>; Date: Fri, 6 Jun 2008 08:43:31 -0700; And a few Imps Regards, John Reed Global Staff Photographer Creative Services Wilson Sporting Goods Co. 8750 W Bryn Mawr Ave, Chicago, Illinois 60631, USA Tel. + 1.773.714.6895, fax +1.773.714.4585 J; /html/fot/2008-06/msg00141.html (9,456 bytes)
12. Re: [Fot] mileage plus (score: 1): Author: Shane Ingate <hottr6@hotmail.com>; Date: Fri, 6 Jun 2008 11:54:41 -0400; Actually, that's exactly the opposite of what I mean. if you consider the total energy costs of producing a new car, there isn't a sufficient resource saving for that added 10 MPG to justify a new on; /html/fot/2008-06/msg00142.html (8,483 bytes)
13. Re: [Fot] mileage plus (score: 1): Author: "Terry Stetler" <tlizzard@msn.com>; Date: Fri, 6 Jun 2008 12:30:12 -0400; If I had to guess you probably don't drive your Ferrari every day. When you do, you drive it for your health... `cos it make you feel good. Now that's real soul food! Greg Greg Petrolati Champaign,; /html/fot/2008-06/msg00143.html (8,526 bytes)
14. Re: [Fot] mileage plus (score: 1): Author: REK46@aol.com; Date: Fri, 6 Jun 2008 12:37:03 EDT; Actually it's my daily driver--I don't own a different car. But I ride my motorcycle more than drive--always have. Bill Babcock Babcock & Jenkins Billb@bnj.com 503.936.7660 www.bnj.com ______________; /html/fot/2008-06/msg00144.html (8,794 bytes)
15. Re: [Fot] mileage plus (score: 1): Author: John Reed <John.Reed@wilson.com>; Date: Fri, 06 Jun 2008 11:39:46 -0500; <snip> ...if they really were interested in "saving the planet" They would scrap that old car instead of selling it.<snip> My understanding is that it is far better economics and less taxing on natur; /html/fot/2008-06/msg00145.html (10,061 bytes)
16. Re: [Fot] mileage plus (score: 1): Author: Bill Babcock <Billb@bnj.com>; Date: Fri, 6 Jun 2008 10:04:28 -0700; Many people routinely trade cars after only 3 years or so (and even sooner). If the trade for a high mileage model falls into that routine, it is a positive, particularly if they can get the old gas; /html/fot/2008-06/msg00146.html (12,123 bytes)
17. Re: [Fot] mileage plus (score: 1): Author: <greenman62@hotmail.com>; Date: Fri, 6 Jun 2008 17:20:34 +0000; Thanks for the laugh, Joe ! Randall _______________________________________________ http://www.team.net/donate.html Fot mailing list Fot@autox.team.net http://autox.team.net/mailman/listinfo/fot; /html/fot/2008-06/msg00147.html (8,894 bytes)
18. Re: [Fot] mileage plus (score: 1): Author: Bill Babcock <billb@bnj.com>; Date: Fri, 6 Jun 2008 10:22:42 -0700; Triumph owners aside! I was talking of the people who never buy new cars because (I can't afford it) and likewise buy a junker and drive it until the wheels fall off without putting any money into ma; /html/fot/2008-06/msg00148.html (9,234 bytes)
19. Re: [Fot] mileage plus (score: 1): Author: Shane Ingate <hottr6@hotmail.com>; Date: Fri, 6 Jun 2008 13:57:19 -0400; Sorry, Joe, my mistake. We don't have those around here; even cars too old for biannual smog inspection are not allowed to emit visible smoke. Yes, I've even gotten a ticket for it, when a valve sea; /html/fot/2008-06/msg00149.html (9,623 bytes)
20. Re: [Fot] mileage plus (score: 1): Author: "Joe Curry" <spitlist@cox.net>; Date: Fri, 6 Jun 2008 11:07:56 -0700; Sorry. That is incorrect. The statement should read: ..the resource cost of producing a Toyota Prius is MORE than building a Tahoe. Shane Ingate, better off asleep, in NM. ___________________________; /html/fot/2008-06/msg00150.html (11,337 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2]