Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Fwd\:\s+Ford\s+Explorer\s+Tires\s+\(Non\s+Roadster\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Fwd\:\s+Ford\s+Explorer\s+Tires\s+\(Non\s+Roadster\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [Fwd: Ford Explorer Tires (Non Roadster (score: 1): Author: R Haug <haugchiro@moscow.com>; Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2000 05:45:04 -0700; /html/datsun-roadsters/2000-09/msg00412.html (7,766 bytes)
2. Re: [Fwd: Ford Explorer Tires (Non Roadster (score: 1): Author: svgkm@halley.ca.essd.northgrum.com; Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2000 08:02:07 -0700; Maybe some of the racer/gurus out there can speak more definitively on this it seems to me that softer tires would exacerbate the tendency to roll - based on this line of logic: The high CG placement; /html/datsun-roadsters/2000-09/msg00420.html (8,696 bytes)
3. Re: [Fwd: Ford Explorer Tires (Non Roadster (score: 1): Author: Gordon Glasgow <glasgow@serv.net>; Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2000 20:36:08 -0700; I thought this was kinda strange advice, too. Maybe what they are trying to do is to reduce the traction enough that you won't be able to build up the lateral G's necessary to roll it. I may be biase; /html/datsun-roadsters/2000-09/msg00487.html (9,737 bytes)
4. Re: [Fwd: Ford Explorer Tires (Non Roadster (score: 1): Author: Russell Southwell <rulee@cityscape.net>; Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2000 22:54:05 -0700; I had an S 10 Blazer that would go anywhere, sure went thru that Stae Park sign sideways and backwards, never did get all the glass out of it. not enough heater in a snow storm with all that glass mi; /html/datsun-roadsters/2000-09/msg00490.html (10,436 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]