Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Healeys\]\s+BJ8\s+suspension\s+thoughts\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Healeys\]\s+BJ8\s+suspension\s+thoughts\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [Healeys] BJ8 suspension thoughts (score: 1): Author: "Steve B. Gerow" <steveg@abrazosdata.com>; Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2010 19:54:17 -0800; I always thought it was cheap of BMC to get rid of the panhard rod on the BJ8. However, when I installed my BJ8 radius arms on my car, I noticed they're quite rigid in sideways motion. Since my car h; /html/healeys/2010-03/msg00674.html (7,586 bytes)
2. Re: [Healeys] BJ8 suspension thoughts (score: 1): Author: john close <f9cougar@yahoo.com>; Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2010 08:55:20 -0700 (PDT); I shall leave work and go try it. Back to you in 2 hours or less - JRC I always thought it was cheap of BMC to get rid of the panhard rod on the BJ8. However, when I installed my BJ8 radius arms on m; /html/healeys/2010-03/msg00690.html (7,939 bytes)
3. Re: [Healeys] BJ8 suspension thoughts (score: 1): Author: Martin Jansen <jule_enterprisesah@yahoo.com>; Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2010 17:25:27 -0700 (PDT); The panhard rod was detrimental in the handling of the car on the early year suspension design. On the early cars, the rear springs ran parallel and the rod was used to hold the rear axle stationary; /html/healeys/2010-03/msg00699.html (9,885 bytes)
4. [Healeys] BJ8 suspension thoughts (score: 1): Author: S and T Miller <stmiller96@hotmail.com>; Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2010 08:33:17 -0400; How much are the late BJ8 rear springs toed in? Were the spring mounts on the forward out rigger moved in closer to the frame or was the main frame changed? __________________________________________; /html/healeys/2010-03/msg00711.html (7,186 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]