Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Healeys\]\s+Heavy\s+clutch\s+question\s*$/: 10 ]

Total 10 documents matching your query.

1. [Healeys] Heavy clutch question (score: 1)
Author: warthodson@aol.com
Date: Fri, 21 May 2010 21:36:04 -0400
A friend has replaced his BJ7 clutch with a "new old stock" one he bought on ebay. Upon casual examination before installation it appeared to be identical to the old one, however now that it is insta
/html/healeys/2010-05/msg00590.html (7,996 bytes)

2. Re: [Healeys] Heavy clutch question (score: 1)
Author: andy pole <ampole@hotmail.com>
Date: Sat, 22 May 2010 06:21:49 +0000
Maybe of no use, but whats it worth, Cannot help you with the part number, but when I wanted to check the part with FirstLine (B and B) they were very helpfull, there contact email was : info@borgan
/html/healeys/2010-05/msg00594.html (7,968 bytes)

3. Re: [Healeys] Heavy clutch question (score: 1)
Author: Oudesluys <coudesluijs@chello.nl>
Date: Sat, 22 May 2010 08:42:16 +0200
This happened to me with a Jensen Healey. I just could not find a cause untill I decided to to take the clutch apart again. I noticed that the blades of the diaphragm spring in the clutch cover were
/html/healeys/2010-05/msg00595.html (10,228 bytes)

4. Re: [Healeys] Heavy clutch question (score: 1)
Author: Alan Seigrist <healey.nut@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 22 May 2010 15:00:06 +0800
It is quite easy to mix up the BJ8 brake master and the BJ8 clutch master. On the BJ8, these units are not the same, but on your BJ7, these units are identical. If for some reason you've mixed up an
/html/healeys/2010-05/msg00597.html (10,202 bytes)

5. Re: [Healeys] Heavy clutch question (score: 1)
Author: Bob Haskell <rchaskell@earthlink.net>
Date: Sat, 22 May 2010 06:01:20 -0400
Per Borg & Beck Catalog S201/15-1969: 45696/108 is the correct cover for a BJ7 till Engine #4878. 75698/11 is then used for till the end of 6 cylinder production (B7J & BJ8). 46696/14 is for an Austi
/html/healeys/2010-05/msg00600.html (10,137 bytes)

6. Re: [Healeys] Heavy clutch question (score: 1)
Author: WILLIAM B LAWRENCE <ynotink@msn.com>
Date: Sun, 23 May 2010 04:55:07 +0000
"The only modification is a one size larger master cylinder to reduce the TADAAAH! Bill Lawrence on identical appear long required, the plate http://autox.team.net/mailman/options/healeys/ynotink@msn
/html/healeys/2010-05/msg00636.html (10,475 bytes)

7. Re: [Healeys] Heavy clutch question (score: 1)
Author: WILLIAM B LAWRENCE <ynotink@msn.com>
Date: Sun, 23 May 2010 05:19:40 +0000
"The only modification is a one size larger master cylinder to reduce the TADAAAH! Bill Lawrence on identical appear long required, the plate http://autox.team.net/mailman/options/healeys/ynotink@msn
/html/healeys/2010-05/msg00637.html (10,480 bytes)

8. Re: [Healeys] Heavy clutch question (score: 1)
Author: warthodson@aol.com
Date: Sun, 23 May 2010 20:51:56 -0400
Follow up to the Heavy clutch question. We removed the clutch master cylinder & discovered that it was a 7/8" bore which is two sizes larger than a stock BJ7 clutch master cylinder. We installed the
/html/healeys/2010-05/msg00662.html (7,715 bytes)

9. Re: [Healeys] Heavy clutch question (score: 1)
Author: Alan Seigrist <healey.nut@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 24 May 2010 16:05:11 +0800
Yes, that's the BJ8 brake master.... -- Sent from my mobile device Alan '52 A90 '53 BN1 '59 Jag Mk IX '64 BJ8 _______________________________________________ Healeys@autox.team.net Donate: http://www
/html/healeys/2010-05/msg00668.html (8,604 bytes)

10. Re: [Healeys] Heavy clutch question (score: 1)
Author: warthodson@aol.com
Date: Mon, 24 May 2010 10:39:23 -0400
Correct, but I should have also mentioned that he also has a 7/8" brake master cylinder, so he didn't simply switch them. To make thinks difficult, the brake cylinder (which was his rebuilt original)
/html/healeys/2010-05/msg00674.html (9,060 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu