Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[SPIT6CGT6\]\s+Lower\s+rear\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[SPIT6CGT6\]\s+Lower\s+rear\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. RE: [SPIT6CGT6] Lower rear (score: 1): Author: mark holbrook <rolling_rock_12@yahoo.com>; Date: Fri, 23 Jun 2000 18:41:30 -0700 (PDT); Yes I have the rotoflex rear end and when I got the car converted to a GT6 Conv. I was told that the leaf spring had a couple leafs of a GT6 taken out to compensate for the weight reduction. THat is; /html/spitfires/2000-06/msg00918.html (9,609 bytes)
2. RE: [SPIT6CGT6] Lower rear (score: 1): Author: Carter Shore <clshore@yahoo.com>; Date: Sat, 24 Jun 2000 07:33:21 -0700 (PDT); Mark, We are lucky that our cars use a 'standard' racing spring size, 2 1/2" ID. Look in any racer supply book, Pegasus, Coleman, Truechoice, etc. and you will find tables of springs, made by Eibach,; /html/spitfires/2000-06/msg00928.html (9,197 bytes)
3. Re: [SPIT6CGT6] Lower rear (score: 1): Author: Mike Ginter <mginter@concentric.net>; Date: Sun, 25 Jun 2000 09:25:09 -0600; I've seen this lower, stiffer spring question come up many times but have never seen an answer posted to the list at large. I'm sure many of us would be interested in any responses to this question.; /html/spitfires/2000-06/msg00967.html (10,413 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]