Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Shotimes\]\s+$OT$\s+Dodge\s+Challenger\s+Appearance\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Shotimes\]\s+$OT$\s+Dodge\s+Challenger\s+Appearance\s*$/: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. [Shotimes] (OT) Dodge Challenger Appearance (score: 1): Author: "Ron Porter" <ronporter@ameritech.net>; Date: Mon, 15 May 2006 02:18:47 -0400; This link was posted over at SHO Forum. Interesting that they are taking it out to car events. http://www.300cforums.com/forums/general-discussion/19312-got-challenger.htm l Ron Porter ______________; /html/shotimes/2006-05/msg00241.html (7,013 bytes)
2. Re: [Shotimes] (OT) Dodge Challenger Appearance (score: 1): Author: Jon Heese <shotimes@jonheese.com>; Date: Mon, 15 May 2006 08:08:43 -0400; Note 3 pedals... Regards, Jon Heese _______________________________________________ Shotimes mailing list Shotimes@autox.team.net http://www.team.net/mailman/listinfo/shotimes; /html/shotimes/2006-05/msg00245.html (7,463 bytes)
3. RE: [Shotimes] (OT) Dodge Challenger Appearance (score: 1): Author: "Bob" <bob@hotpursuit.net>; Date: Tue, 16 May 2006 09:42:54 -0700; The engine bay on a production car can't look like that, can it? -- Bob _______________________________________________ Shotimes mailing list Shotimes@autox.team.net http://www.team.net/mailman/listi; /html/shotimes/2006-05/msg00255.html (8,022 bytes)
4. Re: [Shotimes] (OT) Dodge Challenger Appearance (score: 1): Author: Donald Mallinson <dmall@mwonline.net>; Date: Tue, 16 May 2006 11:58:40 -0500; It can, but production line realities mean it would take way too long to make it look neat. The current trend is to put wires where they are shortest, safest, easiest to make on a production line (n; /html/shotimes/2006-05/msg00258.html (9,123 bytes)
5. RE: [Shotimes] (OT) Dodge Challenger Appearance (score: 1): Author: "Ron Porter" <ronporter@ameritech.net>; Date: Tue, 16 May 2006 15:11:58 -0400; Take the appearance cover off your Hemi. Besides looking better, it won't hold the heat over the intake. Ron Porter Bob, It can, but production line realities mean it would take way too long to make; /html/shotimes/2006-05/msg00261.html (9,795 bytes)
6. Re: [Shotimes] (OT) Dodge Challenger Appearance (score: 1): Author: Donald Mallinson <dmall@mwonline.net>; Date: Tue, 16 May 2006 14:56:17 -0500; Yea, Ron, I thought of that about 1 second after seeing the engine for the first time. Under that cover is a truly ugly mish-mash of wires and tubes/hoses that would not be there if the engine weren'; /html/shotimes/2006-05/msg00265.html (11,269 bytes)
7. RE: [Shotimes] (OT) Dodge Challenger Appearance (score: 1): Author: "Ron Porter" <ronporter@ameritech.net>; Date: Tue, 16 May 2006 17:21:41 -0400; I dunno, I think that Ryan's looks fine after pulling the cover about a day after he bought it. I nice, functional look Ron Porter Yea, Ron, I thought of that about 1 second after seeing the engine f; /html/shotimes/2006-05/msg00267.html (11,810 bytes)
8. Re: [Shotimes] (OT) Dodge Challenger Appearance (score: 1): Author: Donald Mallinson <dmall@mwonline.net>; Date: Wed, 17 May 2006 07:52:59 -0500; With wires and hoses running all over, it can't be nearly as pleasing to look at as a 60's Hemi. You have to admit his engine looks less pleasing than the SHO V6 with that beautiful intake right ther; /html/shotimes/2006-05/msg00273.html (13,189 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 8
Page: [1]