Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Shotimes\]\s+HP\s+\&\s+Torque\s+Figures\s+for\s+3\.0\s+\+\s+3\.2\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [Shotimes] HP & Torque Figures for 3.0 + 3.2 (score: 1)
Author: Peter Maggiacomo <gtsrider@yahoo.com>
Date: Mon, 22 May 2006 11:16:46 -0700 (PDT)
Does anyone have the factory Hp & Torque figures for the 3.0 and the 3.2. It would help me decide if the swap is worth the effort. It's actually the torque I'm looking for from the 3.2. In Florida I
/html/shotimes/2006-05/msg00305.html (7,477 bytes)

2. Re: [Shotimes] HP & Torque Figures for 3.0 + 3.2 (score: 1)
Author: "Leigh Smith" <leighsm@comcast.net>
Date: Mon, 22 May 2006 15:40:57 -0400
Ford decided that additional low-end torque was necessary to work with the slushbox. The stall speed of the torque converter would have been too high with the 3.0, so Ford had Yamaha bore the engine
/html/shotimes/2006-05/msg00306.html (8,636 bytes)

3. Re: [Shotimes] HP & Torque Figures for 3.0 + 3.2 (score: 1)
Author: "Leigh Smith" <leighsm@comcast.net>
Date: Mon, 22 May 2006 15:55:04 -0400
I've always thought that, and I've been driving SHO's for 10 years. At half throttle I get stomped by Escorts for Pete's sake! But then the same is true of my gennie 1970 Z28. That LT-1 motor shares
/html/shotimes/2006-05/msg00307.html (9,184 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu