Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Shotimes\]\s+RE\:\s+$OT$\s+Dodge\s+Challenger\s+Appearance\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Shotimes\]\s+RE\:\s+$OT$\s+Dodge\s+Challenger\s+Appearance\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [Shotimes] Re: (OT) Dodge Challenger Appearance (score: 1): Author: "Dave Garber" <dave.garber@comcast.net>; Date: Mon, 15 May 2006 09:34:31 -0400; Yep. And that doesn't look like a 'dummy pedal' as some others have posited. If you look at that shifter, it's definitely a manual transmission! Sweet! Dave Garber Pittsburgh, PA 99 White, 98k 99 Sil; /html/shotimes/2006-05/msg00246.html (8,011 bytes)
2. [Shotimes] RE: (OT) Dodge Challenger Appearance (score: 1): Author: "Ron Porter" <ronporter@ameritech.net>; Date: Mon, 15 May 2006 11:09:42 -0400; Well, that's Motor Trend!! I dropped them about 25 ears ago, and occasionally reading an issue doesn't leave me regretting that decision!! I agree, the new Camaro concept does nothing for me, primari; /html/shotimes/2006-05/msg00247.html (9,836 bytes)
3. Re: [Shotimes] RE: (OT) Dodge Challenger Appearance (score: 1): Author: Ron Childs <rbchilds@pacbell.net>; Date: Mon, 15 May 2006 08:56:08 -0700 (PDT); The Challanger looks great but... it is based on the Chrysler 300 and weighs two tons. Granted that a hemi will motivate it well enough but at 500 - 600 lbs less, I'll go with a Mustang. -Ron I agree; /html/shotimes/2006-05/msg00248.html (9,802 bytes)
4. RE: [Shotimes] RE: (OT) Dodge Challenger Appearance (score: 1): Author: "Ron Porter" <ronporter@ameritech.net>; Date: Mon, 15 May 2006 14:40:01 -0400; I wouldn't kick either of them out of my garage.....in fact if I had the $$$$ and garage space, I would have both of them.....but NOT the new Camaro, even if it had the Z06 engine. Ron Porter "Withou; /html/shotimes/2006-05/msg00249.html (11,282 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]