Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Tigers\]\s+Headers\s+versus\s+Cast\s+Iron\s+Exhaust\s+Manifolds\s*$/: 17 ]

Total 17 documents matching your query.

1. [Tigers] Headers versus Cast Iron Exhaust Manifolds (score: 1)
Author: "Would U. Believe" <porsche911E@verizon.net>
Date: Tue, 01 Jun 2010 16:57:34 -0400
I was wondering if anyone has a strong opinion about whether a Tiger is really better off with headers versus the original cast iron exhaust manifolds. I think the obvious benefit of headers is the g
/html/tigers/2010-06/msg00010.html (7,434 bytes)

2. Re: [Tigers] Headers versus Cast Iron Exhaust Manifolds (score: 1)
Author: Tom Parker <tkparker1941@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 1 Jun 2010 17:43:43 -0400
I just installed a set of Rick's (SS) headers. They went in with no modification, although the collectors don't quite point to the frame holes. The fit is tight, but not so tight that you can't work
/html/tigers/2010-06/msg00014.html (9,406 bytes)

3. Re: [Tigers] Headers versus Cast Iron Exhaust Manifolds (score: 1)
Author: Steve Laifman <slaifman@socal.rr.com>
Date: Tue, 01 Jun 2010 15:39:24 -0700
Hmm! You have both a Porsche 911 and a Tiger. Me too. It's my son's ambition to own every sports car I ever had, and at the same time. He is well on his way. Have sound on: *Have sound on: * < http:/
/html/tigers/2010-06/msg00015.html (9,233 bytes)

4. Re: [Tigers] Headers versus Cast Iron Exhaust Manifolds (score: 1)
Author: " Ron Fraser" <rfraser@bluefrog.com>
Date: Tue, 1 Jun 2010 19:22:13 -0400
The LH exhaust manifold is a Falcon part C3DZ-9431-A and maybe readily available. The RH exhaust manifold is a Tiger only part, not easily found. Ken Miles took 2 log type Ford exhaust manifolds, re
/html/tigers/2010-06/msg00016.html (9,137 bytes)

5. Re: [Tigers] Headers versus Cast Iron Exhaust Manifolds (score: 1)
Author: Larry Paulick <lpaulick1@verizon.net>
Date: Wed, 02 Jun 2010 10:02:10 -0400
Besides performance, if you coat your headers with a ceramic coating, the underhood temp is reduced, as an added benefit. Larry _______________________________________________ Tigers@autox.team.net D
/html/tigers/2010-06/msg00018.html (8,068 bytes)

6. Re: [Tigers] Headers versus Cast Iron Exhaust Manifolds (score: 1)
Author: "Rense, Mark (GE Indust, ConsInd)" <mark.rense@ge.com>
Date: Thu, 3 Jun 2010 14:36:25 -0400
Some thoughts on exhaust headers from an old Motorhead: Our 260/289 engines were designed for mundane passenger car usage, not with high-performance in mind, so an untuned cast iron manifold was all
/html/tigers/2010-06/msg00021.html (9,897 bytes)

7. Re: [Tigers] Headers versus Cast Iron Exhaust Manifolds (score: 1)
Author: "Thomas Witt" <atwittsend@verizon.net>
Date: Tue, 08 Jun 2010 11:23:55 -0700
A bit late to reading this but I found an interesting article over on the Mopar side of my life. They took a mildly prepared 360 and tried every manifold/header possible that would fit the heads. The
/html/tigers/2010-06/msg00080.html (9,746 bytes)

8. Re: [Tigers] Headers versus Cast Iron Exhaust Manifolds (score: 1)
Author: Tony Somebody <achd73@yahoo.com>
Date: Tue, 8 Jun 2010 12:11:40 -0700 (PDT)
It makes sense and out of 3 sets I just sold my best set- after reading your out loud thinking, perhaps I should have sold the second best as I have at least two more Tigers to complete and I could
/html/tigers/2010-06/msg00081.html (11,106 bytes)

9. Re: [Tigers] Headers versus Cast Iron Exhaust Manifolds (score: 1)
Author: Tom Parker <tkparker1941@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 8 Jun 2010 15:23:39 -0400
I can't say whether Rick's headers will improve the 289's performance by themselves, and I'll never know, mainly because the stock Ford heads are sitting in a box next to the stock Ford exhaust manif
/html/tigers/2010-06/msg00082.html (12,122 bytes)

10. Re: [Tigers] Headers versus Cast Iron Exhaust Manifolds (score: 1)
Author: "Rense, Mark (GE Indust, ConsInd)" <mark.rense@ge.com>
Date: Tue, 8 Jun 2010 16:02:25 -0400
Variable tuned exhaust has been used for years on high-performance motorcycles. Yamaha pioneered it with their EXUP system, now Honda and Kawasaki use it and BMW's new S1000 sportbike uses it (191 H
/html/tigers/2010-06/msg00083.html (9,153 bytes)

11. Re: [Tigers] Headers versus Cast Iron Exhaust Manifolds (score: 1)
Author: michael king <michael.s.king@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 9 Jun 2010 09:12:19 +1000
Variable inlets were used on the 90's M3 BMW's and in F1 until it got banned they had variable inlets and exhausts.. lots of modern cars have butterfly valves in the mufflers these days to let them
/html/tigers/2010-06/msg00084.html (10,613 bytes)

12. [Tigers] Headers versus Cast Iron Exhaust Manifolds (score: 1)
Author: Joel Martin <jmartiniii@yahoo.com>
Date: Wed, 9 Jun 2010 11:49:35 -0700 (PDT)
Who makes and sells the best headers for the MK 1A tigers? I see many 'coated' but what are they coated with? What color should they be? Thanks Joel _______________________________________________ Ti
/html/tigers/2010-06/msg00090.html (8,170 bytes)

13. Re: [Tigers] Headers versus Cast Iron Exhaust Manifolds (score: 1)
Author: Tom Parker <tkparker1941@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 9 Jun 2010 20:25:41 -0400
Rick at SS has a set (uncoated) for less than $300 that fit my Mark 2 with no modification. Performance Coatings in Georgia (They're in Hemmings and on the web) will coat them for $205 plus shipping.
/html/tigers/2010-06/msg00102.html (9,624 bytes)

14. Re: [Tigers] Headers versus Cast Iron Exhaust Manifolds (score: 1)
Author: Tony Somebody <achd73@yahoo.com>
Date: Wed, 9 Jun 2010 19:31:52 -0700 (PDT)
Rick at SS has a set (uncoated) for less than $300 that fit my Mark 2 with no modification. Performance Coatings in Georgia (They're in Hemmings and on the web) will coat them for $205 plus shipping.
/html/tigers/2010-06/msg00106.html (10,301 bytes)

15. Re: [Tigers] Headers versus Cast Iron Exhaust Manifolds (score: 1)
Author: drmayf <drmayf@mayfco.com>
Date: Wed, 09 Jun 2010 22:32:09 -0700
Oops, tiz not me, lol. Dr. Moonstone is who you are searching for. Sean's realitive has a coating company in Fresno, Calif who does headers etc. Cap's Bright Hot Coatings. He did the headers fo the S
/html/tigers/2010-06/msg00109.html (9,979 bytes)

16. Re: [Tigers] Headers versus Cast Iron Exhaust Manifolds (score: 1)
Author: Tony Somebody <achd73@yahoo.com>
Date: Thu, 10 Jun 2010 04:00:01 -0700 (PDT)
SORRY to the LIST and both Dr. Mayf and Dr. Moonstone- I get the days mixed up, why not two Dr's. who happen to have names that start w/ the same letter (M). At any rate, I would still recommend chec
/html/tigers/2010-06/msg00110.html (12,507 bytes)

17. Re: [Tigers] Headers versus Cast Iron Exhaust Manifolds (score: 1)
Author: Carmods@aol.com
Date: Thu, 10 Jun 2010 09:15:46 EDT
_tkparker_ (mailto:tkparker1941@gmail.com) writes: Rick at SS has a set (uncoated) for less than $300 that fit my Mark 2 with no modification Tom, I would recommend that you try the headers in the ca
/html/tigers/2010-06/msg00114.html (8,598 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu